Vaisheshika-sutra with Commentary

by Nandalal Sinha | 1923 | 149,770 words | ISBN-13: 9789332869165

The Vaisheshika-sutra 2.2.22, English translation, including commentaries such as the Upaskara of Shankara Mishra, the Vivriti of Jayanarayana-Tarkapanchanana and the Bhashya of Chandrakanta. The Vaisheshika Sutras teaches the science freedom (moksha-shastra) and the various aspects of the soul (eg., it's nature, suffering and rebirth under the law of karma). This is sutra 2 (‘causes of doubt with respect to sound’) contained in Chapter 2—Of the Five Bhutas, Time, and Space—of Book II (of substances).

Sūtra 2.2.22 (Causes of Doubt with respect to Sound)

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration, Word-for-word and English translation of Vaiśeṣika sūtra 2.2.22:

तुल्यजातीयेष्वर्थान्तरभूतेषु विशेषस्य उभयथा दृष्टत्वात् ॥ २.२.२२ ॥

tulyajātīyeṣvarthāntarabhūteṣu viśeṣasya ubhayathā dṛṣṭatvāt || 2.2.22 ||

tulya-jātiyeṣu—in homogene ms things; arthāntārabhūteśu—in heterogeneous things; viśeṣasya—of the particular, i; e., the difference—or differentia; ubhayāthā—in both; dṛṣṭatvāt—the being observed; because it is observed.

22. (Doubt arises in respect of Sound), because its difference is observed both in (from) homogeneous objects and in (from) heterogeneous objects.

Commentary: The Upaskāra of Śaṅkara Miśra:

(English rendering of Śaṅkara Miśra’s commentary called Upaskāra from the 15th century)

Sound having thus appeared as an object which contains properties, its being the mark or Ether depends solely on its being an Attribute, Therefore to establish its Attribute-ness, he brings out the trilateral Doubt, and says:

[Read sūtra 2.2.22 above]

“Doubt arises in respect of sound,”—is the complement of the aphorism. Sound-ness and perceptibility by the ear are observed in Sound. And this gives rise to Doubt whether Sound be an Attribute, or a Substance, or an Action, because the ‘particular,’ i.e., difference or divergence is observed both in homogeneous objects, namely the twenty-three Attributes, and in heterogeneous objects, namely Substances, and Actions. But Doubt, whether it be a Genus, or a Species, or a Combination, does not arise, inasmuch as difference in point of being existent, being produced by a cause, etc., is observed.

It may be said, “A non-common property cannot be the cause of Doubt by being the cause of indecision or uncertainty. And Soundness as well as perceptibility by the ear is really a non-common property.” We say: Truly its difference or divergence is common to homogeneous and hetrogeneous things, and so only this common difference or divergence has been stated to be the cause of Doubt. Difference or divergence, which is the counter-opposite of Sound-ness, is the common property; and the characteristic of being the counter-opposite of the difference or divergence belonging to both, in other words, Sound-ness, is the non-common property. Therefore it has been said: “From the observation of the difference in both.” Here the observation of particular, i.e., the difference, in both, i.e., in homogeneous and heterogeneous things, constituting the cause of Doubt, it becomes really the common property.—22.

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: