Brahma Sutras (Shankara Bhashya)

by Swami Vireshwarananda | 1936 | 124,571 words | ISBN-10: 8175050063

This is the English translation of the Brahma-sutras including the commentary (Bhashya) of Shankara. The Brahma-sutra (or, Vedanta-sutra) is one of the three canonical texts of the Vedanta school of Hindu philosophy and represents an early exposition the Vedantic interpretation of the Upanishads. This edition has the original Sanskrit text, the r...

Chapter III, Section III, Adhikarana XXX

Adhikarana summary: The Self is a separate entity from the body

Till now the Upasanas have been discussed. But the utility of these Upasanas depends on the existence of an individual apart from the body who can reap the results of the Upasanas. In the absence of such an individual the Upasanas and even Vedanta teaching become useless. So in this topic the existence of an Atman apart from the body is taken up for discussion.

 

 Sutra 3,3.53

एक आत्मनः शरीरे भावात् ॥ ५३ ॥

eka ātmanaḥ śarīre bhāvāt || 53 ||

eka—Some (deny); ātmanaḥ—(the existence) of an Atman (besides the body); śarīre (suti?) bhāvāt—(for It) exists (only) when there is a body.

53. Some (deny) (the existence) of an Atman (separate from the body), (for It) exists (only) when there is a body.

This Sutra gives the view of the Charvakas or materialists, who deny the existence of an Atman other than the body. They say that man is only a body, having consciousness for its quality, and that consciousness is like the intoxicating property that is produced when certain materials are put together, none of which singly is intoxicating. They arrive at this conclusion in this way. Consciousness is seen to exist only when there is a body. Independent of the body it is nowhere experienced. Hence it is only a quality of the body. Therefore, there is no separate Self in this body.

 

 Sutra 3,3.54

व्यतिरेकः, तद्भावाभावित्वात्, न तु, उपलब्धिवत् ॥ ५४ ॥

vyatirekaḥ, tadbhāvābhāvitvāt, na tu, upalabdhivat || 54 ||

vyatirekaḥ—Separateness; tadbhāva-abhāvitvātfor (consciousness) does not exist even when there is the body; na—not (so); tu—but; upalabdhivat—as in the case of cognition.

54. But not (so); (a Self) separate (from the body does exist), for (consciousness) does not exist even when there is the body (after death); as in the case of cognition.

This Sutra refutes the view expressed in the previous one. Consciousness cannot be a quality of the body, for we do not find consciousness in a body; after a person dies. So this consciousness is a quality of something different from and residing in the body. Again the Charvakas also accept that the cognizer is different frejm the thing cognized. If so, since we experience our body, we who cognize it must be different from our body; and this thing which cognizes this body of ours is the Self, and consciousness is a quality of this Self, rather its nature.

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: