Manusmriti with the Commentary of Medhatithi
by Ganganatha Jha | 1920 | 1,381,940 words | ISBN-10: 8120811550 | ISBN-13: 9788120811553
This is the English translation of the Manusmriti, which is a collection of Sanskrit verses dealing with ‘Dharma’, a collective name for human purpose, their duties and the law. Various topics will be dealt with, but this volume of the series includes 12 discourses (adhyaya). The commentary on this text by Medhatithi elaborately explains various t...
Go directly to: Concepts.
Verse 2.87
Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:
जप्येनैव तु संसिध्येद् ब्राह्मणो नात्र संशयः ।
कुर्यादन्यन्न वा कुर्यान् मैत्रो ब्राह्मण उच्यते ॥ ८७ ॥japyenaiva tu saṃsidhyed brāhmaṇo nātra saṃśayaḥ |
kuryādanyanna vā kuryān maitro brāhmaṇa ucyate || 87 ||It is by means of repeating mantras that the Brāhmaṇa succeeds;—there is no doubt in this. he may, or may not, do anything else, one comes to be called a Brāhmaṇa if he is of a friendly disposition.—(87)
Medhātithi’s commentary (manubhāṣya):
By means of repeating Mantras alone the Brāhmaṇa succeeds;—i.e., acquires all desirable results,and also attains Brahman.
No such doubt on this point should be entertained in the mind, as—“How can one acquire, by means of Mantra-repetition alone, such results as are obtained only by means of such elaborate acts as the Jyotiṣṭoma and the rest, which cost much effort, or from deep and prolonged meditations?”—Because as a matter of fact, such success does actually follow.
‘He may do anything else.’—In the shape of the Jyotiṣṭoma and other non-com pulsory acts, —‘or not do it.’—For ‘one comes to be called a Brahmaṇa if lie is of a friendly disposition.’ ‘Maitra’ is the same as ‘mitra.’ The Brahmaṇa should be friendly to all living beings; and how can there be any friendliness (benevolence) in such acts as the killing of animals during the Agnīṣomīya offerings?
This passage is purely valedictory; it is not a prohibition of the killing of animals during sacrifices; because it is only supplementary to what has gone before (and as such it cannot be taken as an independent prohibition), and because such killing is directly enjoined in the Veda itself.
Thus ends the process of Repeating Mantras.—(87)
Explanatory notes by Ganganath Jha
‘Maitraḥ’—‘of friendly disposition (towards all living beings)’—Medhātithi;—‘worshipper of Mitra, Sun’ (suggested by Rāghavāṇanda).
‘Brāhmaṇaḥ’—‘one who will be absorbed in Brahman’ (Kullūka);—‘the best of Brāhmaṇas’ (Rāghavānanda);—
Buhler remarks—“Medhātithi and Govindarāja take the last clause differently: it is declared (in the Veda that) a Brāhmaṇa (shall be) a friend (of all creatures).” But in Medhātithi we find no mention of the Veda here.
The verse is clearly meant to be deprecatory of Animal-sacrifices, which involve the killing of animals, whereas the Brāhmaṇa should be friendly to all creatures.
This verse is quoted in Yatidharmasaṃgraha (p. 127).
Comparative notes by various authors
Viṣṇu-smṛti, 55.21 and Vasiṣṭha, 26.12—[reproduce the words of Manu].
Other Dharmashastra Concepts:
Discover the significance of concepts within the article: ‘Verse 2.87’. Further sources in the context of Dharmashastra might help you critically compare this page with similair documents:
Brahman, Animal sacrifice, Killing of animals.
Concepts being referred within the main category of Hinduism context and sources.
Best of Brahmanas, Explanatory note, Friendly disposition, Repeating Mantra.