The Tattvasangraha [with commentary]
by Ganganatha Jha | 1937 | 699,812 words | ISBN-10: 8120800583 | ISBN-13: 9788120800588
This page contains verse 2237 of the 8th-century Tattvasangraha (English translation) by Shantarakshita, including the commentary (Panjika) by Kamalashila: dealing with Indian philosophy from a Buddhist and non-Buddhist perspective. The Tattvasangraha (Tattvasamgraha) consists of 3646 Sanskrit verses; this is verse 2237.
Verse 2237
Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:
अथान्योऽपि स्वभावेन कश्चिदेवावबोधकः ।
तत्रानिबन्धने न स्यात्कोसाविति विनिश्चयः ॥ २२३७ ॥athānyo'pi svabhāvena kaścidevāvabodhakaḥ |
tatrānibandhane na syātkosāviti viniścayaḥ || 2237 ||“If it be urged that—‘that other word also (which did not exist at the time of the convention) may be expressive through its own inherent aptitude’,—then, in that case, in the absence of any fixed rule, there could be no certainty as to which is the word that is really expressive.”—[Ślokavārtika—eternality of words, 245-246].—(2237)
Kamalaśīla’s commentary (tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā):
The following Text anticipates and answers an argument of the Opponent:—[see verse 2237 above]
‘Other Word’—i.e. if the Word that exists at the time of its use is held to be expressive, through its own inherent aptitude, like the Word that existed at the time of the Convention;—that cannot be right; because in the absence of a fixed rule, there could be no certainty as to which Word is expressive of which meaning.—(2237)