The Tattvasangraha [with commentary]

by Ganganatha Jha | 1937 | 699,812 words | ISBN-10: 8120800583 | ISBN-13: 9788120800588

This page contains verse 1655 of the 8th-century Tattvasangraha (English translation) by Shantarakshita, including the commentary (Panjika) by Kamalashila: dealing with Indian philosophy from a Buddhist and non-Buddhist perspective. The Tattvasangraha (Tattvasamgraha) consists of 3646 Sanskrit verses; this is verse 1655.

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

न चावस्तुन एते स्युर्भेदास्तेनास्य वस्तुता ।
कार्यादीनामभावः स यो भावः कारणादिना ॥ १६५५ ॥

na cāvastuna ete syurbhedāstenāsya vastutā |
kāryādīnāmabhāvaḥ sa yo bhāvaḥ kāraṇādinā || 1655 ||

“These several kinds (of negation) could not appertain to a non-entity; hence negation must be regarded as an entity; for instance, the ‘negation’ of the effect consists in the ‘presence’ of the cause—[Ślokavārtika-negation, 8].—(1655)

 

Kamalaśīla’s commentary (tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā):

The following might be urged—‘Even if there is this fourfold division, how does that make Negation an entity?’

The answer to this is as follows:—[see verse 1655 above]

There can be no division of a Non-entity; as division always rests in entities.—Hence Negation must be an entity.

“What sort of an entity can it be?”

Answer:—‘The Negation of the Effect, etc. etc.’—The Presence of the Cause—Milk, for instance—is what constitutes the Negation of the Effect—Curd; and the Presence of the Effect—Curd—is what constitutes the Negation of the Cause—Milk, It is in this way that Negation is an entity.—(1655)

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: