"OSCE Assessment for Academic Improvement in Family Medicine, Arar"
Journal name: World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Original article title: Periodical assessment of objective structured clinical examination (osce) at family medicine program, northern borders (arar), saudi arabia - a method for academic improvement
The WJPR includes peer-reviewed publications such as scientific research papers, reports, review articles, company news, thesis reports and case studies in areas of Biology, Pharmaceutical industries and Chemical technology while incorporating ancient fields of knowledge such combining Ayurveda with scientific data.
This page presents a generated summary with additional references; See source (below) for actual content.
Original source:
This page is merely a summary which is automatically generated hence you should visit the source to read the original article which includes the author, publication date, notes and references.
Saleh Algabbany, Dr. Reda Goblan Al Anazi and K. Chandra Sekhar
World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research:
(An ISO 9001:2015 Certified International Journal)
Full text available for: Periodical assessment of objective structured clinical examination (osce) at family medicine program, northern borders (arar), saudi arabia - a method for academic improvement
Source type: An International Peer Reviewed Journal for Pharmaceutical and Medical and Scientific Research
Doi: 10.20959/wjpr20223-23385
Copyright (license): WJPR: All rights reserved
Download the PDF file of the original publication
Summary of article contents:
Introduction
This study investigates the efficacy of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) as a method of evaluating residents within the Family Medicine Program in Arar, Saudi Arabia. Conducted in July 2021, the research involved a cohort of 48 residents across four levels (R1 to R4) and aimed to assess their performance, demographic influences on scores, and identify areas in need of improvement. The OSCE has emerged as a favored assessment tool for gauging clinical competencies within medical education due to its structured nature, which emphasizes practical skills, knowledge, and attitudes.
Gender Differences in OSCE Scores
One significant finding of the study was the observable gender differences in OSCE scores, particularly in specific stations. Males outperformed females in the epilepsy OSCE station, scoring an average of 83.40 compared to 67.15 for females. Conversely, females achieved higher mean scores in the antenatal care station, scoring 86.78 against males' 78.46. Statistical analysis underscored these differences, revealing significant associations in performance based on gender in certain OSCE stations, which suggests that training and evaluation methods may need to be tailored to address these disparities.
Resident Level and Academic Performance
The study also highlighted the influence of resident levels on OSCE performance. A consistent upward trend in mean scores was observed as residents progressed from R1 to R4, with scores rising from 64.61% in R1 to 73.94% in R4. Residents at higher levels demonstrated improved competencies, particularly in ECG and epilepsy stations, where R4 residents scored significantly better than their R1 counterparts. This correlation indicates that increased experience and exposure to clinical scenarios enhance residents' skills, reinforcing the necessity of progressively challenging training modules within the curriculum.
Pass Rates and Overall Scores
An impressive pass rate of 95.7% was reported among all participants, with 100% passing rates in R1, R2, and R4 levels. The overall mean OSCE score for all participants was 70.98, revealing a solid foundation of knowledge and skill among the residents. Despite this high success rate, the study identified areas needing attention, particularly in the Dermatology and X-ray stations, suggesting that targeted training could better prepare residents in these areas to ensure comprehensive clinical readiness.
Conclusion
In summary, the study solidifies the OSCE's role as a critical evaluative tool within the Family Medicine residency, highlighting its effectiveness in assessing various competencies. While the overall performance of residents was commendable, the observed gender differences and variable scores across different levels indicate that continuous curriculum development, along with focused training, is essential. These efforts will not only enhance skill acquisition but also ensure that all residents meet the required standards of clinical competence, ultimately improving patient care outcomes.
FAQ section (important questions/answers):
What was the purpose of the study on OSCE?
The study aimed to assess the OSCE scores of family medicine residents, analyze demographic associations, and enhance the academic performance in the program at Northern Borders, Saudi Arabia.
How many residents participated in the OSCE study?
A total of 48 residents from R1 to R4 levels participated in the study conducted in July 2021.
What were the key findings related to gender differences?
The study found significant differences in OSCE scores between genders in some stations, with males performing better in epilepsy and females excelling in antenatal care.
What was the overall pass rate for the OSCE exam?
Approximately 95.7% of the participants passed the OSCE examination, with 4.3% failing.
What statistical methods were used in this OSCE study?
Data was analyzed using SPSS, applying Chi-square tests for categorical variables and ANOVA for mean score comparisons, with a significance level set at P ≤ 0.05.
What improvements are suggested for future OSCE exams?
The study suggests focusing more on improving training in Dermatology, X-ray, and ECG stations to enhance residents' performance in future OSCE assessments.
Glossary definitions and references:
Scientific and Ayurvedic Glossary list for “"OSCE Assessment for Academic Improvement in Family Medicine, Arar"”. This list explains important keywords that occur in this article and links it to the glossary for a better understanding of that concept in the context of Ayurveda and other topics.
1) Study (Studying):
Study refers to the systematic investigation of a particular subject to uncover facts, principles, or insights. In medical education, studies like this aim to enhance teaching methods and evaluation techniques. This study specifically evaluates Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) performance among family medicine residents to improve educational outcomes.
2) Family:
Family is a term often used in medical education to denote a branch of medicine focusing on comprehensive healthcare for individuals and families. In this context, it signifies the Family Medicine Program in Saudi Arabia, emphasizing primary care and the role of family medicine professionals in community health.
3) Medicine:
Medicine is the science and practice of diagnosing, treating, and preventing illness. In the study, it serves as the overarching field within which family medicine and its educational programs are encapsulated, aiming to provide residents with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to practice effectively.
4) Epilepsy:
Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures. In the context of the study, it is one of the clinical scenarios evaluated in the OSCE, highlighting its importance within the family medicine curriculum. Effective diagnosis and management are critical skills for family physicians.
5) Male:
Male refers to one of the two primary gender classifications. In the study, the performance of male residents is analyzed to identify potential differences in OSCE scores compared to their female counterparts. Understanding gender-related performance can guide tailored educational interventions.
6) Table:
A table is a systematic arrangement of data, often used to present research findings clearly and concisely. In this study, tables summarize demographic data, OSCE scores, and performance metrics, facilitating easy comparison and interpretation of results among family medicine residents.
7) Teaching:
Teaching involves the process of imparting knowledge, skills, and values. The study evaluates how OSCEs are used as teaching tools in family medicine programs. Effective teaching methods are essential for preparing residents to face real-life clinical situations competently.
8) Performance:
Performance refers to how well individuals carry out their duties or tasks. In this study, the performance of family medicine residents during OSCEs is analyzed to assess their clinical skills and knowledge application. Understanding performance levels aids in program improvement.
9) Training:
Training is the process of developing skills and knowledge through instruction and practice. In the medical context, it prepares residents for real-world challenges. The study addresses OSCE as a training tool for enhancing clinical competencies in family medicine.
10) Knowledge:
Knowledge represents the information, understanding, and skills acquired through experience or education. In the study, it is a critical element assessed through OSCEs, as residents must demonstrate comprehension of medical concepts and practical application in patient care scenarios.
11) Discussion:
Discussion refers to the exchange of ideas and information. In the study, it underscores the importance of analyzing OSCE results, engaging educators and residents in dialogue regarding performance and training needs, leading to continuous improvement in curriculum and assessment strategies.
12) Learning:
Learning is the process of acquiring new understanding, skills, or knowledge. The study emphasizes that OSCEs foster active learning among residents by engaging them in practical assessments that mirror real-life clinical situations, promoting deeper comprehension and retention of medical knowledge.
13) Post:
Post refers to the period following an event or stage. In medical education, it often signifies postgraduate training, like residency. The study evaluates the performance of postgraduates in their training program, focusing on their progression and development in family medicine.
14) Reliability:
Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of assessment outcomes. In the context of the study, it is important to ensure that OSCEs accurately reflect residents' competencies over time, serving as a dependable evaluation method for their clinical knowledge and skills.
15) Developing:
Developing refers to the process of growth or progress. In this study, it highlights the continuous improvement of educational programs, such as family medicine residency, aiming to refine teaching practices, evaluation methods, and ultimately better prepare healthcare professionals.
16) Education:
Education is the formal process of teaching and learning. In the realm of medical training, education encompasses the entire curriculum, including theoretical knowledge and practical skills necessary for effective patient care. This study evaluates the effectiveness of educational assessments within family medicine.
17) Science (Scientific):
Science refers to the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world. In the medical field, it underscores evidence-based practice and the importance of research. The study contributes to the scientific discourse on medical education assessment methodologies.
18) Arrangement:
Arrangement denotes the systematic organization or structuring of data. In this study, proper arrangement of OSCE data in tables allows clear communication of findings, facilitating analysis and interpretation of residents' performance across various domains in family medicine.
19) Calculation:
Calculation involves the mathematical assessment of data. In the study, calculation of mean scores from OSCE results plays a crucial role in determining residents' performance levels, allowing for statistical analysis that informs educational outcomes and curriculum improvements.
20) Perception:
Perception refers to the interpretation or understanding of situations or experiences. In the context of the study, it highlights how residents perceive their learning experiences and the assessment methods utilized, which can influence their attitudes towards training and improvement.
21) Collecting:
Collecting refers to the systematic gathering of data or information. In this study, collecting OSCE scores and demographic data is vital to assessing the effectiveness of the family medicine residency program, providing insights into areas for targeted improvement.
22) Chandra:
Chandra is a name that typically signifies an individual's contribution or role in a study. In this context, K. Chandra Sekhar is one of the collaborators in the research, lending expertise to the evaluation of family medicine residents and contributing to the study's findings.
23) Anxiety:
Anxiety represents a feeling of worry or unease. In the educational context, anxiety can affect performance. The study acknowledges that residents may experience anxiety during assessments like OSCE, which could impact their scores and ultimately guide supportive educational practices.
24) Miṇi (Mini):
Mini often refers to a smaller or abbreviated version of an assessment or exercise. In medical training, mini-clinical evaluations (mini-CEX) serve as a method to assess residents' clinical skills in a concise format, complementing OSCEs for comprehensive evaluation strategies.
25) Life:
Life encompasses the various aspects of human existence and well-being. In the study, it represents the realistic scenarios that OSCEs simulate, preparing residents for actual patient encounters and enhancing their problem-solving and clinical skills within family practice.
Other Science Concepts:
Discover the significance of concepts within the article: ‘"OSCE Assessment for Academic Improvement in Family Medicine, Arar"’. Further sources in the context of Science might help you critically compare this page with similair documents:
Statistical analysis, Gender difference, Ethical consideration, Antenatal Care, Cross-sectional study, Demographic factors, Self-directed learning, Statistically significant association, Objective structured clinical examination, Clinical performance, Statistical package for social science.
Concepts being referred in other categories, contexts and sources.