Parental Knowledge on Thalassaemia and Refusal of Child Screening
Journal name: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
Original article title: Parental Knowledge on Thalassaemia and Factors Associated with Refusal to Screen Their Children
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal published online at least six times a year. It covers all aspects of medical sciences and prioritizes high-quality research.
This page presents a generated summary with additional references; See source (below) for actual content.
Original source:
This page is merely a summary which is automatically generated hence you should visit the source to read the original article which includes the author, publication date, notes and references.
Mohammad Azmi Che Mat, Lili Husniati Yaacob, Rosnani Zakaria
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences:
(A peer-reviewed, open-access journal)
Full text available for: Parental Knowledge on Thalassaemia and Factors Associated with Refusal to Screen Their Children
Year: 2020 | Doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.1.13
Copyright (license): CC BY 4.0
Download the PDF file of the original publication
Summary of article contents:
Introduction
Thalassemia is a genetic blood disorder prevalent in Malaysia, which results from a reduced synthesis of hemoglobin chains, leading to various health complications. Managing thalassemia effectively involves implementing screening programs to identify at-risk individuals. The present study aimed to assess the knowledge of thalassemia among parents of secondary school children and to investigate the factors contributing to the refusal of thalassemia screening for their children.
Knowledge and Screening Refusal
The study revealed that the average knowledge score regarding thalassemia among parents was low, with a mean score of 11.8 out of 21. Factors associated with screening refusal included low knowledge scores and sex, with female parents being more likely to refuse screening. The predominant reason for refusal was the belief that their children were not at risk due to the absence of a family history of thalassemia. This insight highlights the critical role knowledge plays in influencing decisions related to health screenings, suggesting that enhancing awareness and understanding of thalassemia could lead to higher acceptance rates for screening.
Conclusion
Overall, the findings indicate a significant knowledge gap regarding thalassemia among parents, which correlates with their acceptance of screening for their children. To improve screening uptake and healthcare access for at-risk populations, targeted educational initiatives must be developed, particularly focused on thalassemia carriers and the importance of screening—even when there is no known family history. Addressing these knowledge deficiencies through comprehensive public health education can play a vital role in enhancing screening acceptance and ultimately in the management of thalassemia in Malaysia.
FAQ section (important questions/answers):
What is the purpose of the thalassemia screening study?
The study aims to determine parental knowledge of thalassemia and identify factors associated with the refusal of thalassemia screening among parents of secondary school children in Malaysia.
What were the main findings regarding parental knowledge of thalassemia?
The mean thalassemia knowledge score among parents was insufficient, highlighting a significant lack of understanding about thalassemia, particularly related to carriers and potential risks for their children.
What factors were associated with parental refusal of screening?
Key factors influencing screening refusal included low knowledge scores and female gender. Many parents believed their children were not at risk for thalassemia, contributing to their decision.
What recommendations were made based on the study’s findings?
The study recommends enhancing educational programs about thalassemia, particularly emphasizing the importance of understanding carrier status, and improving current educational materials provided to parents to facilitate informed decision-making.
Glossary definitions and references:
Scientific and Ayurvedic Glossary list for “Parental Knowledge on Thalassaemia and Refusal of Child Screening”. This list explains important keywords that occur in this article and links it to the glossary for a better understanding of that concept in the context of Ayurveda and other topics.
1) Thalassemia:
Thalassemia is a group of inherited blood disorders that affect the body's ability to produce hemoglobin. It is significant due to its prevalence, particularly in certain populations. Understanding thalassemia is crucial for early diagnosis, treatment options, and preventive measures, which are vital for improving patient quality of life and reducing healthcare costs.
2) Knowledge:
Knowledge refers to the awareness or understanding of a subject. In the context of thalassemia, parental knowledge regarding the disease influences decisions on screenings for their children. Increased knowledge can lead to better health decisions, acceptance of screenings, and ultimately, improved health outcomes for children at risk of thalassemia.
3) Study (Studying):
A study is a systematic investigation aimed at discovering and interpreting facts regarding a particular subject. This study on thalassemia involves examining parental knowledge and factors affecting screening refusal. It provides insights that can be used to inform public health interventions, improve screening acceptance, and enhance thalassemia education efforts.
4) Table:
In research, tables are used to present data systematically and succinctly. Tables in this study summarize demographic information, knowledge scores, and reasons for screening refusal. They enhance understanding of the findings and make it easier for readers to grasp complex information about parental attitudes and knowledge related to thalassemia screenings.
5) Disease:
A disease is a disorder of structure or function in a living organism that produces specific symptoms. Thalassemia is a significant genetic condition requiring management. Understanding its implications helps raise awareness about prevention, encourages screening, and supports research into effective treatments and support systems for those affected by thalassemia.
6) Reason:
Reason denotes the cause or explanation for an action or decision. In the study, reasons for parental refusal of thalassemia screening are analyzed to understand barriers to participation. Identifying these reasons is essential for developing targeted educational programs that address misconceptions and fears related to thalassemia and enhance screening uptake.
7) Education:
Education involves the systematic instruction, teaching, and training of individuals, particularly regarding health and disease awareness. For thalassemia, effective education campaigns are crucial in improving knowledge, thereby influencing parents' decisions on screenings. Enhancing educational materials can empower families with the knowledge needed to make informed health choices.
8) Blood:
Blood is a vital fluid responsible for transporting oxygen, nutrients, and immune cells throughout the body. In thalassemia, blood disorders are a central issue as patients often require blood transfusions for survival. Understanding the relationship between thalassemia and blood health emphasizes the need for effective monitoring and treatments.
9) Beta:
Beta refers to the beta globin gene, which is involved in hemoglobin production. Thalassemia major, a severe form of thalassemia, commonly arises from mutations in this gene. Understanding beta thalassemia's implications informs both screening processes and treatment plans, highlighting the genetic underpinnings of this blood disorder.
10) Family:
Family plays a crucial role in decisions about health screenings, especially for children. In the context of thalassemia, familial health history significantly influences awareness and perceptions of risk. Understanding family dynamics and beliefs surrounding thalassemia helps inform educational efforts and increase acceptance of screening programs for at-risk populations.
11) Life:
Life in this context relates to the quality of life and longevity of individuals with thalassemia. Effective management, including timely screenings and treatments, can significantly enhance the life expectancy and overall well-being of patients. Knowledge about thalassemia's impact on life emphasizes the importance of early interventions and support.
12) Rules:
Rules refer to established guidelines or principles. In thalassemia screening, rules regarding eligibility, consent, and procedural methods are critical. Understanding these rules ensures ethical compliance and fosters trust among participants, ultimately enhancing the screening process's efficiency and effectiveness within educational and healthcare settings.
13) Birth:
Birth relates to the onset of life and is a critical aspect of thalassemia, as the disease can be inherited. Understanding thalassemia's genetic transmission is pivotal for implementing screening programs aimed at preventing the birth of children affected by severe thalassemia, thereby reducing the disease's burden on healthcare systems.
14) Male:
Male refers to the gender of individuals, which can be influential in health decision-making. In the context of this study, examining differences between male and female parents regarding thalassemia screening refusal highlights potential gender-based perceptions and biases that may impact participation rates in screening programs.
15) Perception:
Perception influences how individuals interpret and respond to information about health risks and screenings. In relation to thalassemia, understanding perceptions held by parents regarding their children's risk can determine their willingness to participate in screening programs. A shift towards positive perceptions can enhance screening acceptance and participation.
16) Marriage:
Marriage often influences health decisions in familial contexts, including those regarding genetic screening like thalassemia. Awareness of how marital status and cultural attitudes toward marriage can impact perceptions of thalassemia screening is vital. This knowledge helps tailor educational efforts to reach couples effectively and encourage informed decision-making.
17) Fear:
Fear is a significant emotional response that can deter participation in health screenings. In the context of thalassemia, fear may arise from concerns about stigmatization, potential positive screening results, or implications for family reputations. Addressing these fears through supportive education can increase screening acceptance among parents.
18) Discussion:
Discussion refers to the process of exploring and analyzing findings from a study. In this research, discussion about the implications of thalassemia knowledge and screening refusal can lead to recommendations for enhancing educational interventions. Constructive dialogue fosters a deeper understanding of the challenges and potential solutions in public health strategies.
19) Attending:
Attending refers to the act of being present or participating in an event or program. In this study, parental attendance at thalassemia screening sessions is crucial for understanding the barriers to participation. Analyzing attendance trends provides insights that can shape effective outreach and education initiatives to promote participation.
20) Bengal (Bemgal):
Bengal, a region in India, may relate to the geographical and cultural contexts influencing health perceptions. The inclusion of studies or comparisons from Bengal can contribute valuable insights about thalassemia awareness and screening strategies. Such cross-regional analyses enhance understanding of diverse health approaches and challenges in genetic disorders.
21) Gupta:
Gupta refers to a common surname in India and could relate to significant research studies or authors contributing to thalassemia awareness and genetics. A reference to Gupta in research may highlight impactful epidemiological findings or case studies that inform public health strategies for managing thalassemia within specific populations.
22) India:
India has a significant prevalence of thalassemia, making it crucial to understand the cultural, social, and healthcare systems in place. Research in India can provide insights into genetic screening practices, awareness campaigns, and the efficacy of public health policies aimed at managing thalassemia and enhancing its prevention.
23) Sign:
Sign pertains to an indication or evidence of a condition. In the context of thalassemia, identifying signs can be essential for early diagnosis and management. Understanding significant signs of thalassemia can facilitate timely interventions, ensuring patients receive proper care before severe complications develop.
24) Redistribution:
Redistribution refers to the allocation of resources or funding, essential for effective public health programs. In the context of thalassemia management, reallocating resources towards screening initiatives can help target at-risk populations, ensuring equitable access to healthcare resources and potentially reducing the long-term burden of thalassemia on the health system.
25) Calculation:
Calculation in research refers to the numerical analysis of data obtained from studies. It is vital for determining sample sizes, statistically analyzing results, and drawing valid conclusions. Accurate calculations ensure the reliability of research findings, enhancing the overall quality and credibility of studies related to thalassemia.
26) Relative:
Relative refers to familial connections that can influence health understanding and decisions. In thalassemia, having relatives with the disease can heighten awareness and concern about genetic risks. Understanding relative connections can help health educators tailor communication strategies to enhance screening acceptance and knowledge about thalassemia.
27) Worry (Worried, Worrying):
Worried expresses a state of concern that can impact decision-making, particularly regarding health screenings. In the context of thalassemia, parents who are worried about their children's potential risk of the disease may have differing attitudes toward screening acceptance. Addressing worries through targeted education can promote greater understanding and screening participation.
28) Science (Scientific):
Science represents the systematic study of the natural world through observation and experimentation. In the context of thalassemia, scientific research is crucial for understanding the genetic mechanisms behind the disease, developing interventions, and improving screening methods, thereby enhancing overall public health education and outcomes.
29) Agama:
Agama refers to religion, which may influence health-related beliefs and decisions. In the context of thalassemia screening, understanding various religious perspectives can help address concerns about screenings and treatment, tailoring educational efforts that respect cultural beliefs while emphasizing the importance of preventive healthcare.
30) Sah:
Shah is a common surname and could relate to important figures or researchers in the field of thalassemia. References to Shah in research studies can identify key contributors to the understanding of thalassemia’s impact within specific communities, thereby enhancing knowledge and awareness of genetic disorders.
31) Post:
Post refers to the subsequent position or arrangements after an event. In terms of thalassemia, post-treatment support is vital for affected patients, including follow-up care and education. Addressing post-screening decisions ensures patients and families receive continuous support and resources to manage health conditions effectively.
Other Science Concepts:
Discover the significance of concepts within the article: ‘Parental Knowledge on Thalassaemia and Refusal of Child Screening’. Further sources in the context of Science might help you critically compare this page with similair documents:
Thalassemia, Medical treatment, Negative attitude, Educational programme, Blood transfusion, Positive attitude, Statistical analysis, Knowledge deficiency, Health education, Blood test, Inclusion criteria, Exclusion criteria, Cross-sectional study, Small sample size, Thalassemia major, Bone Marrow Transplant, Blood Transfusion Therapy, Study protocol, Socio-demographic factors, Iron overload, Confidence interval, School children, Screening test, Public health education, Genetic counselling, Cystic fibrosis, Red Blood Cell, Knowledge Score, Informed decision, Questionnaire, Carrier testing, Associated complications, Family member, Unmarried participants, Gene Inheritance, Inherited diseases.
Concepts being referred in other categories, contexts and sources.
Stigmatisation, Multiple logistic regression, Local study, Future marriage, Study showed.