Maternal Satisfaction Survey: Spinal Anaesthesia for C-Sections
Journal name: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
Original article title: Survey on Maternal Satisfaction in Receiving Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal published online at least six times a year. It covers all aspects of medical sciences and prioritizes high-quality research.
This page presents a generated summary with additional references; See source (below) for actual content.
Original source:
This page is merely a summary which is automatically generated hence you should visit the source to read the original article which includes the author, publication date, notes and references.
T.Kumaravadivel Dharmalingam, Nor Azian Ahmad Zainuddin
Download the PDF file of the original publication
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences:
(A peer-reviewed, open-access journal)
Full text available for: Survey on Maternal Satisfaction in Receiving Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section
Year: 2013
Copyright (license): CC BY 4.0
Summary of article contents:
Introduction
This study investigated patient satisfaction following spinal anaesthesia in obstetric patients undergoing caesarean sections at Hospital Teluk Intan. Given that spinal anaesthesia is the most commonly administered anaesthesia in obstetric procedures, understanding its impact on patient satisfaction is crucial. Regional anaesthesia is favored for its benefits, including reduced risk of complications for both mother and child, yet it can also pose challenges that might affect patient comfort and perceived quality of care.
Patient Satisfaction with Spinal Anaesthesia
The results illustrated a high level of satisfaction among the surveyed patients, with 97% expressing contentment with their spinal anaesthesia experience. A total of 200 patients, primarily consisting of Malays (64.5%), reported on factors influencing their satisfaction, such as the adequacy of analgesia and the effectiveness of the anaesthetic. Although all patients indicated satisfaction with the information provided about anaesthesia, 2% noted difficulty concentrating on the explanation due to labour pain. Nevertheless, 88.5% of participants expressed a willingness to choose spinal anaesthesia for future surgeries, despite some citing reasons for refusal, such as concerns over awareness during the operation and experiences of inadequate analgesia.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the study indicated that high patient satisfaction rates can be achieved with spinal anaesthesia if practitioners ensure quality delivery and address potential complications. Improving the skills of anaesthetists, offering thorough communication about the procedure, and establishing rapport with patients are recommended strategies to enhance satisfaction. Although the majority preferred spinal anaesthesia for subsequent procedures, understanding and addressing patient concerns about possible complications remains essential for optimizing their experiences and outcomes.
FAQ section (important questions/answers):
What was the focus of the study on spinal anaesthesia?
The study evaluated patient satisfaction after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean sections, the most common anaesthesia method for obstetric patients, and identified factors influencing satisfaction and future acceptance.
What were the demographics of patients in the study?
A total of 200 patients were surveyed, predominantly Malay (64.5%), followed by Indian (17%), Chinese (14%), and others (4.5%). Most patients were aged between 20 and 30 years.
What were the overall satisfaction rates among the patients?
The study found that 97% of patients were satisfied with spinal anaesthesia, while 3% were dissatisfied due mainly to inadequate analgesia during surgery or failed spinal anaesthesia.
What improvements could enhance patient satisfaction in spinal anaesthesia?
To improve satisfaction, better anaesthesia quality, skilled clinical practices, and effective communication from the anaesthesiologists are recommended, along with addressing potential side effects and ensuring patient understanding.
Other Health Sciences Concepts:
Discover the significance of concepts within the article: ‘Maternal Satisfaction Survey: Spinal Anaesthesia for C-Sections’. Further sources in the context of Health Sciences might help you critically compare this page with similair documents:
High satisfaction, Patient care, Adverse effect, Healthcare, Backache, Labour pain, Language barrier, Trained personnel, Age-group, Maternal morbidity, Cross-sectional study, Surgical Procedure, Patient perspective, Post operative, Urinary retention, Statistical analyses, Patient characteristics, Spinal anaesthesia, Patient satisfaction, Maternal mortality, Surgical Site, Psychological disorder, Life threatening complications, Spinal block, Caesarean section, Analgesic, Cerebro Spinal Fluid, Caesarean delivery, Surgical trauma, Side effect, General anaesthesia, Post-operative analgesia, Intraoperative complications, Maternal satisfaction, Post-operative nausea, Post-operative nausea and vomiting, Venous thromboembolism, Operating conditions, Factors associated, Patient demographic, Labor pain, Operating room, Pregnant patient, Satisfaction level, Sympathetic response, Satisfaction rate, Elective surgeries, Parity distribution, Emergency case, Post operative complication, Clinical skill, Surgical dressing, Emergency surgeries, Regional anaesthesia, Failed spinal anaesthesia, Intrathecal morphine, Local anaesthetic agent, Active phase of labor, Post-operative vomiting, Patient expectation, Unmet expectations, Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), Good rapport, Elective cases, Anaesthesia methods, Post-operative backache, Refusal rate, Anaesthetic method, Adequate analgesia, Multiple factors, Cardiac event, Patient satisfaction rate, Spinal headache, Newborn, Patient's desire, Patient opinion, Average satisfaction, Constructed questionnaire, Dissatisfied patients, Postdural puncture headache, Epidural blood patch, Surgical stimulation, Patient refusal, Neuraxial block, Optimal working conditions.