The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: Celebrating 18 Years
Journal name: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
Original article title: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences in Its 18th Year: A Look at the Journal’s Growth
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal published online at least six times a year. It covers all aspects of medical sciences and prioritizes high-quality research.
This page presents a generated summary with additional references; See source (below) for actual content.
Original source:
This page is merely a summary which is automatically generated hence you should visit the source to read the original article which includes the author, publication date, notes and references.
Dahlia Abdul Latiff, Mohamad Irfan, Abdullah Jafri Malin
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences:
(A peer-reviewed, open-access journal)
Full text available for: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences in Its 18th Year: A Look at the Journal’s Growth
Year: 2012
Copyright (license): CC BY 4.0
Download the PDF file of the original publication
Summary of article contents:
Introduction
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) celebrated its 18th anniversary in 2011, marking a significant milestone in its development as one of the leading medical journals in Malaysia. This editorial outlines MJMS's accomplishments, particularly its increased visibility through indexing in PubMed, which has enhanced the citability of its publications. The year highlighted a substantial growth in manuscript submissions, accompanied by a commitment to maintaining the quality of content through rigorous pre-review and peer-review processes.
Increasing Manuscript Submissions and Review Stringency
In 2011, MJMS received a total of 195 manuscript submissions, showing a 30% increase from the previous audit period. However, strict pre-review screening led to a high unsubmission rate of 53.3%, primarily due to plagiarism detection and formatting issues. Of the manuscripts sent for review, only 37.3% were ultimately accepted for publication, indicating a growing rejection rate of 62.7%. A significant factor contributing to these rejections was a lack of originality and poor presentation. This scenario reflects the challenge faced by the journal in balancing the pressure on researchers to publish while ensuring that submitted works meet international standards.
Conclusion
MJMS aims to further improve the quality and quantity of submissions by participating in educational initiatives and leveraging digital technologies for wider access. Plans for the future include ambitions to be indexed in the Thomson Reuters scientific database and to enhance digital accessibility through mobile applications and digital object identifiers. The editorial team expresses gratitude to all contributors and remains focused on elevating the journal's standards and visibility within the global research community.
FAQ section (important questions/answers):
What significant milestone did the Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences achieve in 2011?
In 2011, MJMS celebrated its 18th anniversary and was accepted for indexing in PubMed, enhancing the visibility and citability of its publications.
How many manuscripts were submitted to MJMS in 2011?
MJMS received a total of 195 manuscript submissions in 2011, indicating a 30% increase compared to the previous year.
What is the pre-review screening process for manuscript submissions?
MJMS employs a strict pre-review screening process, including compulsory plagiarism checks, to ensure originality and adherence to formatting before manuscripts are sent to reviewers.
What future plans does MJMS have for enhancing its journal?
MJMS aims to improve quality and quantity of publications, increase digital accessibility, and aspire for inclusion in the Thomson Reuters scientific database.
Glossary definitions and references:
Scientific and Ayurvedic Glossary list for “The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: Celebrating 18 Years”. This list explains important keywords that occur in this article and links it to the glossary for a better understanding of that concept in the context of Ayurveda and other topics.
1) Science (Scientific):
Scientific refers to practices and methodologies rooted in systematic investigation and experimentation. In the context of MJMS, scientific approaches are key to evaluating research quality and contributing to knowledge in medical fields. Upholding scientific integrity ensures that published research fosters trust and contributes substantially to the community.
2) Quality:
Quality is a crucial aspect of scholarly publishing, determining the standard of articles submitted to journals like MJMS. The editorial team is committed to maintaining high-quality standards, focusing on originality, scientific rigor, and clarity. Ensuring quality helps to enhance the journal's reputation and contributes to the scientific community's integrity.
3) Table:
In academic publications, tables are used to present data systematically and succinctly, allowing readers to understand complex information at a glance. The use of tables in MJMS aids in illustrating submission statistics and geographical contributions, facilitating better comprehension of the journal’s performance and trends over time.
4) Peer review:
Peer review is an essential process in academic publishing, involving evaluation of manuscripts by experts in the field before acceptance. It assures that published work meets the necessary standards of research integrity and scientific validity. MJMS utilizes peer review to enhance the credibility of the manuscripts it publishes.
5) Developing:
Developing refers to nations or regions that are in the process of economic growth and improvement in various sectors, including research. MJMS aims to support authors from developing countries by providing guidance and opportunities, helping elevate their contributions to medical sciences and allowing for broader representation in scientific discourse.
6) Field:
Field refers to a specific domain of study or practice, such as medical sciences in the case of MJMS. Different fields have distinct standards, challenges, and expectations. MJMS aims to uphold its status within the medical field, showcasing relevant and innovative research to enrich the discipline and its practices.
7) Pir:
Peer refers to individuals of equal standing in a particular context. In the academic realm, peer reviewers are experts assessing submitted manuscripts to ensure scholarly integrity. The peer review process at MJMS is vital for maintaining high publication standards, relying on specialists to evaluate research and provide constructive feedback.
8) Discussion:
Discussion in academic papers involves interpreting results, addressing implications, and evaluating findings in relation to existing literature. In MJMS, discussions are vital for fostering deeper understanding of research outcomes, driving further inquiries, and enhancing dialogue among researchers, thus contributing to the growth of scientific knowledge and collaboration.
9) Knowledge:
Knowledge constitutes the body of information, understanding, and skills that are acquired through education and experience. At MJMS, emphasis on knowledge dissemination through published research contributes to the medical community's capacity to innovate and apply findings effectively, ultimately benefiting healthcare and enhancing professional practices.
10) Mountain:
Mountain is a metaphor for challenges or obstacles that need to be overcome. In the context of MJMS, the challenge of achieving higher indexing standards, such as inclusion in Thomson Reuters' databases, represents a significant 'mountain' to conquer, indicating the journal's aspirations for growth, visibility, and scholarly impact.
11) Writing:
Writing is the process of composing text and is crucial in academic publishing for conveying research findings. Effective writing ensures clarity and coherence, essential for engaging readers and peer reviewers alike. MJMS focuses on high writing standards to communicate complex scientific concepts and findings effectively.
12) Reason:
Reason refers to the rationale behind actions or decisions. At MJMS, the reason for implementing stricter submission criteria and peer review processes stems from a commitment to ensuring high-quality publications. This rationale seeks to enhance the journal’s prestige and the trustworthiness of the research it disseminates.
13) India:
India is represented as a significant contributor to MJMS in terms of manuscript submissions. Highlighting India emphasizes the journal's international reach and collaboration among researchers from diverse backgrounds, reflecting the growing global engagement in medical research and the inclusive nature of MJMS in fostering international scientific dialogue.
14) Worry (Worried, Worrying):
Worry pertains to concerns about the quality of submissions and the implications for the journal’s reputation. MJMS expresses concern over maintaining rigorous standards amidst pressures to publish, emphasizing the importance of discernment in manuscript acceptance to safeguard the integrity and academic standing of the journal.
15) Sign:
Sign refers to an indicator or evidence of a particular trend or condition. In the context of MJMS, declining manuscript quality could signal broader issues in research practices and pressures faced by authors. Recognizing such signs allows the journal to adapt its strategies for improving manuscript standards.
16) Pur:
Poor reflects inadequate quality or standards, particularly in research submissions. MJMS addresses issues related to poorly written manuscripts and inappropriate studies, stressing the importance of quality control to prevent the publication of subpar research, thereby upholding the journal's standards and contributions to the medical field.
Other Science Concepts:
Discover the significance of concepts within the article: ‘The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: Celebrating 18 Years’. Further sources in the context of Science might help you critically compare this page with similair documents:
Peer review, Medical science, Continuous support, Original article, Scientific community, Research paper, Developing countries, Case report, Review article, Manuscript submission, Digital technology, Publication date, Research community, Print version, Manuscripts submitted, Scientific database, Quick Response Code, Funding, Mobile device, Special thank, Editorial board member.
Concepts being referred in other categories, contexts and sources.
Report, Letter, Rejection, Manuscript, Publication.