Survival of 8 mm implants in posterior resorbed ridges: pilot study.
Journal name: Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Original article title: Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study
The Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology (JISP) publishes original scientific articles on periodontology (the study of supporting structures of teeth) and oral implantology. It is a bimonthly open-access journal with special issues for specific occasions.
This page presents a generated summary with additional references; See source (below) for actual content.
Original source:
This page is merely a summary which is automatically generated hence you should visit the source to read the original article which includes the author, publication date, notes and references.
Bangalore Sridhar Shilpa, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan Vasudevan, Manohar Laxman Bhongade, Vidya Baliga, Vikas Vilas Pakhare, Prasad Vijayrao Dhadse
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology:
(A bimonthly open-access journal)
Full text available for: Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study
Year: 2018 | Doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_368
Copyright (license): CC BY-NC-SA
Summary of article contents:
Introduction
In recent years, the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with reduced bone height has posed significant challenges in dental implantology. Traditional approaches often involve complex and expensive ridge augmentation procedures to facilitate the placement of standard-length dental implants. However, short implants, defined as those measuring 8 mm or less in length, have emerged as a promising alternative in such scenarios. This study investigated the clinical and radiographic survival of 8-mm implants placed in posterior resorbed ridges, aiming to emphasize their viability compared to conventional implant lengths.
Short Implants as a Viable Alternative
The study included 11 patients who underwent the placement of 12 short implants in areas with limited bone height (9-10 mm). Surgical outcomes were evaluated over a 12-month follow-up period, revealing a 100% survival rate for all implants. Furthermore, the mean bone loss recorded was within acceptable limits, with an average of 1.1 mm mesially and 0.83 mm distally, thus indicating stable bone integration around the implants. The rigorous clinical examination showcased healthy gingival conditions, suggesting that proper oral hygiene practices were maintained throughout the study by the patients. These findings align with earlier research that suggests comparable success rates of short implants to standard implants, reinforcing the idea that short implants can effectively eliminate the need for invasive surgical interventions while yielding satisfactory clinical outcomes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the utilization of 8-mm short implants presents a minimally invasive and effective solution for patients with atrophic jaw ridges, avoiding the complications and costs associated with traditional augmentation procedures. This study highlights the potential of short implants, demonstrating their safety and successful integration within the primary year post-placement. The promising results warrant further investigation with larger sample sizes and extended follow-ups to enhance the understanding of the long-term performance of short implants in dental rehabilitation.
FAQ section (important questions/answers):
What was the aim of the study on short implants?
The study aimed to evaluate the survival rates of 8 mm long implants in posterior resorbed ridges, assessing both clinical and radiographic outcomes over a 12-month follow-up period.
What were the inclusion criteria for the study participants?
Participants included patients aged 18 or older with single missing posterior teeth, a residual bone height of 9-10 mm, and a minimum of three months healing after extraction.
What were the main findings regarding implant success rates?
All implants demonstrated a 100% survival rate after 12 months, with acceptable bone loss and healthy gingival conditions at the follow-up.
What benefits do short implants provide compared to conventional ones?
Short implants reduce the need for invasive ridge augmentation procedures, minimizing surgical risks, costs, and recovery time while providing similar success rates.
What clinical measurements were taken around the implants?
Measurements included probing pocket depth, width of keratinized gingiva, gingival recession, and modified plaque and bleeding indices to assess oral hygiene and peri-implant health.
Glossary definitions and references:
Scientific and Ayurvedic Glossary list for “Survival of 8 mm implants in posterior resorbed ridges: pilot study.”. This list explains important keywords that occur in this article and links it to the glossary for a better understanding of that concept in the context of Ayurveda and other topics.
1) Table:
In the context of the article, 'Table' refers to organized data presentations that summarize patients' characteristics, measurements, and outcomes related to the study on short implants. Tables facilitate easier comprehension and enable comparisons among different data points, enhancing clarity and systematic analysis of results across various metrics.
2) Study (Studying):
The term 'Study' highlights the systematic investigation undertaken to evaluate the survival of short dental implants in patients with reduced bone height. It underscores the research methodology, objectives, and findings aimed at contributing to the existing knowledge base of implant dentistry, ultimately guiding clinical practices and decision-making.
3) Measurement:
Within the article, 'Measurement' pertains to the quantification of various parameters related to implant outcomes, such as bone loss or clinical indices. Accurate measurements are critical for assessing the effectiveness of the treatment and understanding the biological responses post-implantation, thereby determining the success or failure of the procedure.
4) Hygiene (Hygienic):
The word 'Hygiene' emphasizes the importance of oral hygiene maintenance in the outcomes of dental implants. Good hygiene practices are essential to limit bacterial accumulation, thereby preventing infections such as peri-implantitis. The study highlights oral hygiene education to enhance outcomes and ensure patients maintain healthy peri-implant environments.
5) Surface:
In the context of dental implants, 'Surface' refers to the area of the implant that interfaces with surrounding bone andsoft tissue. The quality and characteristics of the implant surface influence osseointegration and overall success, making surface properties a crucial factor in implant design and patient outcomes.
6) Bleeding:
The term 'Bleeding' relates to measurement indices used in evaluating peri-implant tissue health. The absence of bleeding on probing (BOP) indicates healthy tissues surrounding the implant. Monitoring bleeding is essential for assessing the inflammatory response and overall success of the dental implant, as excessive bleeding may signal complications.
7) Relative:
The word 'Relative' typically pertains to comparisons between different groups, conditions, or variables within the study. For example, it might describe the relative success rates of short implants versus longer ones, aiding in understanding the benefits or drawbacks of specific treatment options in implant dentistry.
8) Inflammation:
Inflammation is a key biological response to tissue injury and is closely monitored in implant studies. High levels of inflammation can lead to complications such as peri-implantitis. Understanding inflammation dynamics enables clinicians to evaluate and manage the health of peri-implant tissues effectively throughout the treatment process.
9) Line:
'Line' can refer to various implications in the study, such as the establishment of baseline records along the gingival line for measurements. It may also refer to the line indicating bone levels around implants, forming a crucial part of visual and radiographic assessments of implant success over time.
10) Accumulation (Accumulating, Accumulate):
In the context of this article, 'Accumulation' pertains to the build-up of dental plaque around implants. It is vital to control plaque accumulation to prevent peri-implant diseases. The study addresses the effects of good oral hygiene in minimizing plaque accumulation, which can significantly impact implant longevity and health.
11) Discussion:
The section labeled 'Discussion' in the study encapsulates the interpretation of results, reinforcing findings, and relating them to existing literature. This part is critical for contextualizing the significance of outcomes, exploring implications for clinical practices, and providing foundational insights for future research directions in implant dentistry.
12) Antibiotic (Antibacterial):
'Antibiotic' references the medications administered to prevent infections post-implant placement. The use of antibiotics is a common practice in implant dentistry to mitigate infection risk, and understanding their role contributes to the study's analysis of successful outcomes and infection rates associated with dental implants in patients.
13) Grafting:
The term 'Grafting' is related to surgical procedures to augment or regenerate bone in areas where implants are to be placed. It highlights an alternative treatment modality that may be required for some patients with insufficient bone height, contrasting with the use of short implants as a less invasive option.
14) Disease:
'Disease' signifies any pathological condition that may adversely affect treatment outcomes, particularly periodontal or systemic diseases. The study emphasizes the exclusion of patients with unmanaged diseases to ensure implant success, highlighting the importance of preoperative assessments in determining suitable candidates for implant therapy.
15) Company:
In the context of the article, 'Company' likely refers to the manufacturer of the dental implants used in the study. Understanding the company behind the implant system can shed light on varying qualities and research associated with different products, as well as their proven track records in clinical use.
16) India:
'India' indicates the geographical location where the study was conducted. The significance lies in understanding regional variations in patient demographics, healthcare access, and the potential applicability of findings within the Indian population. It adds context to the study's relevance in different cultural and medical settings.
17) Silk:
The term 'Silk' is associated with the material used for sutures in surgical procedures. In this study, silk sutures are specified for closing incisions post-implant placement, highlighting the importance of suture choice in ensuring proper healing and minimizing complications in the surgical protocol.
18) Pain:
'Pain' refers to the discomfort experienced by patients during and after the implant procedure. The study emphasizes the importance of managing pain effectively postoperatively to improve patient satisfaction and recovery. Understanding pain levels can guide clinicians in providing adequate analgesia and overall patient care.
19) Pur:
The term 'Poor' often describes unfavorable conditions, such as poor oral hygiene or systemic health, affecting treatment outcomes. In the study, patients with poor hygiene may face increased risks for implant failure, highlighting the significance of pre-implementation assessments and patient education to improve overall treatment success.
Other Science Concepts:
Discover the significance of concepts within the article: ‘Survival of 8 mm implants in posterior resorbed ridges: pilot study.’. Further sources in the context of Science might help you critically compare this page with similair documents:
Clinical examination, Radiographic examination, Oral hygiene instruction, Peri-implant mucositis, Peri-implantitis, Clinical parameter, Minimally invasive surgery, Biological complications, Two-stage approach.