International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (MDPI)

2004 | 525,942,120 words

The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, transdisciplinary journal published by MDPI. It publishes monthly research covering various areas including global health, behavioral and mental health, environmental science, disease prevention, and health-related quality of life. Affili...

Diversity and Antimicrobial Activity of Culturable Fungal Endophytes in...

Author(s):

Sharon Pelo
Department of Biotechnology and Food-Technology, University of Johannesburg, 55 Beit Street, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa
Vuyo Mavumengwana
DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Campus, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
Ezekiel Green
Department of Biotechnology and Food-Technology, University of Johannesburg, 55 Beit Street, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa


Download the PDF file of the original publication


Year: 2020 | Doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020439

Copyright (license): Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.


[Full title: Diversity and Antimicrobial Activity of Culturable Fungal Endophytes in Solanum mauritianum]

[[[ p. 1 ]]]

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Diversity and Antimicrobial Activity of Culturable Fungal Endophytes in Solanum mauritianum Sharon Pelo 1 , Vuyo Mavumengwana 2 and Ezekiel Green 1, * 1 Department of Biotechnology and Food-Technology, University of Johannesburg, 55 Beit Street, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa; shanon.pelo@gmail.com 2 DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Campus, Cape Town 7505, South Africa; vuyom@sun.ac.za * Correspondence: egreen@uj.ac.za Received: 21 November 2019; Accepted: 8 December 2019; Published: 9 January 2020 Abstract: Plant endophytes are microbial sources of bioactive secondary metabolites, which mimic the natural compounds chemistry of their respective host plants in a similar manner. This study explored the isolation and identification of fungal endophytes, and investigated the antibacterial and antimycobacterial activity of their crude extracts Fungal endophytes were isolated from Solanum mauritianum , identified using morphological traits and internal transcribed spacer ribosomal-deoxyribonucleic acid (ITS-rDNA) sequence analysis. Eight fungal endophytes were identified as Aureobasidium pullulans, Paracamarosporium leucadendri , Cladosporium sp., Collectotrichum boninense, Fusarium sp., Hyalodendriella sp., and Talaromyces sp., while Penicillium chrysogenum was isolated from the leaves and unripe fruits. Good activity was observed for the crude extracts of Paracamarosporium leucadendri inhibiting Mycobacterium bovis , Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 6 µ g / mL. Crude extracts of Fusarium sp., showed activity at 9 µ g / mL against M. bovis, M. smegmatis and K. pneumonia . In general, the crude extracts showed great activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and novel results for two mycobacteria species M. bovis and M. smegmatis . The results provide evidence of diverse fungal endophytes isolated from Solanum mauritianum, and evidence that fungal endophytes are a good source of bioactive compounds with pharmaceutical potential, particularly against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Keywords: antimycobacterial; secondary metabolites; fungal endophytes; minimum inhibitory concentration; Mycobacterium tuberculosis ; Solanum mauritianum and Penicillium chrysogenum 1. Introduction Plants act as hosts to several endophytic microorganisms, known to produce bioactive compounds of novel potential use in agriculture, modern medicine and the pharmaceutical industry. Endophytes have a symbiotic association with the host plant [ 1 ] and are responsible for assisting the plants to adapt to abiotic and biotic stress [ 2 ]. Endophytes include bacteria and fungi, however fungal endophytes are the most researched because they are a potential source of bioactive natural products and have been shown to produce a variety of secondary metabolites with interestingly complex molecular sca ff olds [ 3 – 5 ]. Several metabolites of interest have been isolated from fungal endophytes, including novel compounds with antibiotics, antialgal, anticancer, antifungal, antimalarial and immunosuppressive activities [ 6 ], for example, the anticancer drug paclitaxel (taxol) was isolated from Pestalotiopsis microspora , an endophytic fungus that colonizes the Taxus wallichiana tree [ 7 ], and camptothecin, a topoisomerase inhibitor, has been isolated from Fusarium solani endophytic fungi in Camptotheca acuminata [ 8 ]. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439; doi:10.3390 / ijerph 17020439 www.mdpi.com / journal / ijerph

[[[ p. 2 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 2 of 11 Vinblastine and Vincristine have also been isolated from the endophytic fungus Fusarium oxysporum , from Catharanthus roseus [ 9 ]. Recent reports have revealed that endophytes produce the same secondary metabolites as those of the host plant, making them a promising source of novel compounds [ 10 ]. Fungal endophytes in Panax ginseng have been investigated for their ability to produce ginsenosides [ 11 ], and the steroidal alkaloid Solamargine from fungal endophytes of Solanum nigrum L. [ 12 ]. Solamargine has been reported to be cytotoxic and has been experimentally attempted on various cancer cell lines (related to skin, breast and liver) [ 13 ]. In this study, e ff orts have been made to isolate endophytic fungi inhibiting a range of pathogenic bacteria including Mycobacterium bovis 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Sampling Method Fresh leaves, stems and fruits from healthy specimens of Solanum mauritianum were collected from the campus garden at the University of Johannesburg (26.11 ◦ 32.6 0 S, 28.03 ◦ 28.9 0 E), in Johannesburg, South Africa. The plant species was chosen based on it being invasive, as it grows fast with massive encroachment into native vegetation (hence, its extermination in South Africa). The plant was identified by a botanist at the University of Johannesburg. Voucher specimen (BTNPSP 02) of the plant was deposited in the herbarium of the University of Johannesburg. Isolation of fungal endophytes was carried out within 24 h of collection, in the Molecular Pathogenesis and Molecular Epidemiology Research Group (MPMERG) laboratory of the Biotechnology and Food Technology Department 2.2. Plant Sterilization and Endophytes Isolation Endophytes were isolated from di ff erent parts of the plant, as explained by Huang et al. [ 14 ]. Surface sterilization was performed following the procedure of Larran et al. [ 15 ]. Briefly, plant parts were washed thoroughly in running tap water, immersed in 250 mL of 70% ethanol for 1 min, then in 250 mL of 5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min, and rinsed in 3 L of sterile distilled water three times separately. The sterile surface sample was cut into 5 mm pieces with a sterile blade, inoculated onto 90 mm plates di ff erent agar including Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) and Nutrient agar and incubated at 25 ◦ C for 7–14 days in the dark. After 7 days, emerging hyphae were transferred to fresh plates for subculturing into pure isolates and subsequent identification. Morphological identification of the isolates was performed according to Katoch et al. [ 16 ]. 2.3. Molecular Identification of Fungal Endophytes The pure colonies of fungal isolates were subjected to a molecular identification method described by White et al. [ 17 ]. Nine morphotypes were selected for further molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis, namely SPS (Sharon Pelo Sample) 28, SPS 33, SPS 35, SPS 38. SPS 39, SPS 40, SPS 41, SPS 42 and SPS 43. Pure cultures were sent to Inqaba Biotec Africa’s Genomics Company (Pretoria, South Africa) for molecular identification. The method of Stephen et al. [ 18 ] was used for DNA isolation. The ITS target region was amplified according to Stephen et al. [ 18 ] using two primers, ITS 1 (5 0 to 3 0 ) (TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG) and ITS 4 (5 0 to 3 0 ) (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) The PCR products were gel extracted with Zymo Research, Zymoclean ™ Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), and sequenced in the forward and reverse directions on the ABI PRISM ™ 3500 xl Genetic Analyzer (ThermoScientific, City Waltham, MA, USA). Purified sequencing products were cleaned using Zymo Research, ZR-96 DNA Sequencing Cleanup Kit ™ (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and were then analyzed using CLC Main Workbench 7 followed by a BLAST search (NCBI). Representative sequences for each isolated fungal endophyte were deposited in the GenBank. The taxa that had 99% ITS sequence similarities were identified as reference taxa species, and some of the described species were identified at the genus level.

[[[ p. 3 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 3 of 11 2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis The sequence data obtained from Inqaba biotect were aligned using Edit Sequence Alignment Editor v.7.2.3 software [ 19 ]. The search for homologous sequences was done using Basic Local Alignment Search Tools (BLAST) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information online [ 20 ] All fungal endophyte sequences with 99–100% similarities had the best hit in the NCBI database [ 21 ]. Alignments of nucleotide sequences (isolate and species obtained through BLAST) were performed using MUSCLE with default options. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using a Maximum likelihood method (ML) method based on the Kamura-Nei model and bootstrap test [ 22 ] of 1000 replicates 2.5. Preparation of the Crude Extracts The fungal endophytes that were grown on PDA and cut into 10 mm plugs were placed in a 200 mL short bottle containing 100 mL of Potato dextrose broth (PDB) and cultured for 14 days at 25 ◦ C ± 2 ◦ C under static conditions [ 23 ]. After fermentation, the mycelium that formed on top was macerated with a mortar and pestle, then filtered on Whatman 1 filter paper. Afterwards, 100 mL of ethyl acetate was added to the bottle, then left at room temperature for 24 h. The organic solvent phase was transferred into a round bottom flask for concentration under vacuum using a rotary evaporator (Labtech EV 311 H) at 40 ◦ C. The extraction process was repeated 3 times. The extracted secondary metabolites were poured into a McCartney bottle and left under a laminar flow to dry. The dried mycelia (and spores) were further extracted in 100 mL of methanol and left at room temperature for 24 h. These were filtered and the methanol extracts were evaporated at 40 ◦ C at 200 rpm 2.6. Mycobacterium Inoculum Preparation Mycobacterium bovis (ATCC 27290) and Mycobacterium smegmatis (ATCC 607) were prepared by inoculating the bacterium into a freshly prepared 10 mL Middlebrook 7 H 9 broth base, supplemented with Middlebrooks OADC (Oliec albumin Dextrose Catalase) growth supplement (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and incubating at 37 ◦ C for 7 days and 37 ◦ C for 24 h, respectively After the incubation period, the test tubes were vortexed and allowed to settle. The supernatant was transferred into Mueller-Hinton broth and adjusted using a spectrophotometer to a 0.5 McFarland standard and further diluted to 1:10 in Mueller-Hinton broth for the test analysis. The other pathogenic strains were prepared according to the method of Marcellano at el. [ 23 ]. Briefly, the bacterial cultures were sub-cultured onto Mueller-Hinton broth and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The overnight bacterial suspensions were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard for the test analysis 2.7. Disc Di ff usion Assay of Crude Extracts from Fungal Endophytes The aliquot of the dried extract was dissolved in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Concentrations of 10 mg / mL for each fungal endophyte crude extracts were prepared and inoculated into 6 mm discs and allowed to dry under sterile conditions for 1 min. Ten percent DMSO was used as a negative control in the bioassays, while rifampicin (40 µ g / mL) was used as a positive control. Pathogenic bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 11774), Escherichia coli (ATCC 10536), Klebsiella pneumonia (ATCC 10031), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6571), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 10145), Mycobacterium bovis (ATCC 27290) and Mycobacterium smegmatis (ATCC 607) were grown on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) plates and used as test organisms. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, while M. bovis plates were incubated for 7 days. Zones of inhibition were determined by measuring the diameters of the clear zones. The whole disc di ff usion assay procedure was performed in triplicate 2.8. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Assay The Resazurin Microtiter Assay (REMA) was performed according to Chien et al. [ 24 ]. The inoculum was prepared from fresh Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA), into Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) and adjusted using a spectrophotometer to a 0.5 McFarland standard and further diluted to

[[[ p. 4 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 4 of 11 1:10 in Mueller-Hinton broth for the test. Briefly, 100 µ L of MHB was dispensed into each well of a flat bottom 96 well plate (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Serial dilution of the crude extract from fungal endophytes were prepared directly in the plate with concentrations ranging from 5 mg / mL to 0.0039 mg / mL. One hundred microliters of the test organism were added into each well. A negative control and positive control (ranging from 40 µ g / mL to 0.019 µ g / mL) were also included for each isolate Sterile water was added to all perimeter wells to avoid evaporation during incubation. The plates were covered, sealed with a plastic bag and incubated at 37 ◦ C under normal atmosphere. After 24 h of incubation, 30 µ L of resazurin solution was added as described by Chien et al. [ 24 ]. Further incubation was required for M. bovis for 7 days, after which 30 µ L of resazurin solution was added. A change of colour from blue to pink indicated the reduction of resazurin by proliferating bacteria. Minimum concentration was defined as the lowest concentration of the drug that prevented this change 3. Results 3.1. Isolation and Identification A total of eight endophytic fungi were isolated from S. mauritianum , with the control not showing any growth. Table 1 shows observed characteristics of the fungal endophytes Table 1. Morphological observations and characteristics of the fungal endophytes Isolates Source Macro and Microscopic Characteristics Fungal Endophyte SPS 28 Stem Flat cream white colonies which turn black with aging, chlamydospores, colonies are smooth with aging, they become slimy and shiny Aureobasidium pullulans SPS 33 Unripe fruit Powdery green spores on the surface, yellow-white lower surface center Penicillium chrysogenum SPS 35 Unripe fruit Black colonies with a slimy and shiny appearance on the surface Hyalodendriella sp SPS 38 Ripe fruit Olivaceous green on the top and bottom greenish black, conidiophores which are dense and becoming powdery or velvety due to abundance, reverse of the colony is greenish-black Cladosporium sp SPS 39 Ripe fruit Colonies grow flat on the media, they are white and turn pink with aging, release orange pigment into the media and spores are formed Fusarium sp SPS 40 Leaves Darker region at the center, yellow-white lower surface. Powdery green spores on the surface Penicillium chrysogenum SPS 41 Leaves Centre is raised, floccose, sulcate center, bottom orange / white, top orange / yellow, soluble pigment faint orange and as it ages it produces green color spores Talaromyces sp SPS 42 Leaves White cotton-like colonies turn brown / greenish with age starting at the center, bottom pale yellow or greenish Collectotrichum boninense SPS 43 Ripe fruit They start out as pale green on the plate and later the hyphae become pale brown in color, has hyphae that pale as spores Paracamarosporium leucadendri SPS: Sharon Pelo’s Sample, Lactophenol blue dye was used to observe at 40 × magnification 3.2. Molecular Confirmation The results revealed a diversity of fungal endophytes from unripe fruits, ripe fruits, stem and leaves, as seen in Table 2 . Two fungal isolates were isolated from unripe fruits while three were from leaves.

[[[ p. 5 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 5 of 11 Table 2. List of fungal taxonomic units identified using the molecular identification Isolates Accession No. Close Relatives Similarity (%) Source SPS 28 MF 926050 Aureobasidium pullulans 98 Stem SPS 33 MF 928760 Penicillium chrysogenum 100 Unripe fruit SPS 35 MF 928761 Hyalodendriella sp 94 Unripe fruit SPS 38 MF 928762 Cladosporium sp 100 Ripe fruit SPS 39 MF 928763 Fusarium sp 99 Ripe fruit SPS 40 MF 928764 Penicillium chrysogenum 100 Leaves SPS 41 MF 928765 Talaromyces sp 99 Leaves SPS 42 MF 928766 Collectotrichum boninense 100 Leaves SPS 43 MF 928767 Paracamarosporium leucadendri 99 Ripe fruit 3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis The blast analysis of the 16 S rRNA gene sequence resulted in 8 varying fungal genera (Figure 1 ) The results of phylogenetic analysis showed distinct clustering of the isolates at 94–100% similarities. Analysis of the ITS 1 and ITS 4 rDNA reveals that the most prevalent endophytic fungi was Penicillium chrysogenum (22.2%) isolated from the leaves and unripe fruit, Fusarium sp. (11.1%) and Paracamarosporium leucadendri (11.1%). The similarity levels of the sequences obtained ranged from 94–100% Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , x 5 of 11 Table 2. List of fungal taxonomic units identified using the molecular identification. Isolates Accession No. Close Relatives Similarity (%) Source SPS 28 MF 926050 Aureobasidium pullulans 98 Stem SPS 33 MF 928760 Penicillium chrysogenum 100 Unripe fruit SPS 35 MF 928761 Hyalodendriella sp. 94 Unripe fruit SPS 38 MF 928762 Cladosporium sp. 100 Ripe fruit SPS 39 MF 928763 Fusarium sp. 99 Ripe fruit SPS 40 MF 928764 Penicillium chrysogenum 100 Leaves SPS 41 MF 928765 Talaromyces sp. 99 Leaves SPS 42 MF 928766 Collectotrichum boninense 100 Leaves SPS 43 MF 928767 Paracamarosporium leucadendri 99 Ripe fruit 3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis The blast analysis of the 16 S rRNA gene sequence resulted in 8 varying fungal genera (Figure 1). The results of phylogenetic analysis showed distinct clustering of the isolates at 94–100% similarities. Analysis of the ITS 1 and ITS 4 rDNA reveals that the most prevalent endophytic fungi was Penicillium chrysogenum (22.2%) isolated from the leaves and unripe fruit, Fusarium sp. (11.1%) and Paracamarosporium leucadendri (11.1%). The similarity levels of the sequences obtained ranged from 94–100%. Figure 1. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of ITS 1 and ITS 4 sequences of all the fungal endophytes isolated from Solanum mauritianum alone, with the sequences from NCBI. The analysis was conducted with MEGA 7 using the Maximum Likelihood method. KY 524459.1 Penicillium chrysogenum isolate 2 OI 2 F 1 T SPS 40 SPS 33 MF 347930.1 Fungal sp. strain Z 7.5 KY 945035.1 Fungal sp. isolate DT 32 MF 405083.1 Penicillium chrysogenum strain Y 5 MF 326608.1 Penicillium rubens strain IHBF 2252 KY 617054.1 Penicillium chrysogenum voucher MHE 26 MC MF 347780.1 Fungal sp. strain F 7.5 KF 984887.1 Talaromyces loliensis strain CBS 172.91 KX 772805.1 Talaromyces islandicus strain ANF 36 KF 984874.1 Talaromyces tardifaciens strain CBS 250.94 AB 588822.1 Penicillium sp. FKI-4942 KX 657354.1 Talaromyces sp. SWP-2017 k strain NRRL 62271 SPS 41 EF 419994.1 Fungal endophyte isolate 9174 EF 420015.1 Fungal endophyte isolate 9060 SPS 28 FN 665415.1 Aureobasidium sp. RBSS-125 FN 665414.1 Aureobasidium sp. RBSS-302 KF 260961.1 Aureobasidium pullulans strain P 6 KY 400091.1 Cladosporium cladosporioides strain 7 P 4 LC 085190.1 Cladosporium sp. AFCN 373 LC 169793.1 Cladosporium sp. p 28 MF 372580.1 Cladosporium cladosporioides isolate Pleurotus ostreatus KX 664414.1 Cladosporium cladosporioides isolate F 47-03 SPS 38 GQ 505435.1 Fusarium sp. NRRL 13444 GQ 505449.1 Fusarium sp. NRRL 34023 GQ 505459.1 Fusarium sp. NRRL 43631 EU 556725.1 Fusarium chlamydosporum strain FC 1 B SPS 39 HE 649492.1 Hypocrea nigricans KY 315934.1 Colletotrichum boninense voucher MM 12 MF 076581.1 Colletotrichum boninense isolate S 20 MF 076585.1 Colletotrichum boninense isolate S 38 MF 076611.1 Colletotrichum sp. isolate S 150 KX 343044.1 Colletotrichum boninense isolate LD 3-8-1 SPS 42 KP 335232.1 Fungal endophyte isolate SNP 026 DQ 885900.1 Camarosporium mamanes strain CBS 120031 EU 552106.1 Camarosporium leucadendri culture-collection KP 335276.1 Fungal endophyte isolate SNP 071 SPS 43 SPS 35 HQ 731647.1 Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef 12 KJ 463525.1 Hyalodendriella sp. FN-4-S 1-1 GQ 996179.1 Fungal sp. mh 1111.8 GU 065525.1 Uncultured fungus clone AE 34-5 KC 339238.1 Cucurbitariaceae sp. MUT 4403 JQ 753975.1 Cochliobolus sativus strain CMON 25 100 77 99 55 98 100 66 61 96 90 85 100 98 100 56 83 100 80 79 100 96 92 64 100 99 57 100 86 99 74 100 59 0.10 Figure 1. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of ITS 1 and ITS 4 sequences of all the fungal endophytes isolated from Solanum mauritianum alone, with the sequences from NCBI. The analysis was conducted with MEGA 7 using the Maximum Likelihood method.

[[[ p. 6 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 6 of 11 3.4. Yield of Extracts More extracts were obtained from Cladosporium sp. (1.02 g), P. chrysogenum (L) (1.24 g), and P. leucadendri (1.23 g) as compared to other endophytes in this study (Table 3 ). Table 3. Ethyl acetate crude extract yields from di ff erent endophytes Fungal Endophytic Isolates Weight of the Extract (g) SPS 28 0.34 SPS 33 0.46 SPS 35 0.59 SPS 38 1.02 SPS 39 0.2 SPS 40 1.24 SPS 41 0.54 SPS 43 1.23 Weight of the extracts extracted with ethyl acetate solvent (g) grams 3.5. Disc Di ff usion Assay of Secondary Metabolites Extracts All endophytes showed positive antimicrobial activity in the preliminary screening. All secondary metabolites from the nine fungal endophytes, with the exception of Fusarium sp., inhibited Mycobacterium bovis whilst only eight inhibited Mycobacterium smegmatis The largest zone of inhibition was observed against P. aeruginosa (23 ± 2.7) inhibited by Fusarium sp. and E. coli and K. pneumonia (17.3 ± 2.1 mm, 19 ± 1.0 mm and 18.3 ± 0.6 mm) respectively, inhibited by Talaromyces sp. secondary metabolites extracted with methanol and ethyl acetate. Further activity was observed against M. bovis, by Fusarium sp at (14 ± 1.7 mm) and P. chrysogenum (F) (14 ± 2.9 mm) extracts M. smegmatis was inhibited by P. leucadendri at (13 ± 1.0 mm), while S. aureus was inhibited by Talaromyces sp. secondary metabolites. Each of the endophytic fungi produced bioactive compounds that exhibited antimicrobial activity against at least one test microorganism used, as shown in Table 4 . Table 4. Antimicrobial activity of the fungal endophytes isolated from Salonum mauritianum Crude Extracts of the Fungal Endophytes Zone of Inhibition (mm) * Gram Positive Gram Negative Acid-Fast Stain Bs Sa Kp Ec Pa Mb Ms A. pullulans 7 ± 1.0 9.9 ± 05 10 ± 2.7 13 ± 1.0 9.7 ± 0.6 11 ± 1.0 10.7 ± 0.6 P. leucadendri - 7.3 ± 1.5 9.7 ± 0.6 11.7 ± 0.6 11 ± 1.0 7.7 ± 1.5 13 ± 1.0 Cladosporium sp 10.3 ± 1.5 7.3 ± 0.6 14.7 ± 0.6 8.7 ± 0.6 10.3 ± 0.6 12.7 ± 2.3 9.7 ± 0.6 Fusarium sp 8.7 ± 0.6 9.7 ± 0.6 10.7 ± 1.5 11.7 ± 0.6 23 ± 2.7 14 ± 1.7 - Hyalodendriella sp 11.3 ± 0.6 7.3 ± 0.6 9.7 ± 0.6 10.7 ± 3.5 9.3 ± 0.6 12.7 ± 2.3 6.7 ± 0.6 P. chrysogenum (F) 12.3 ± 1.2 8.7 ± 1.5 - 11.7 ± 0.6 7.7 ± 0.6 14 ± 2.9 10.3 ± 0.6 P. chrysogenum (L) 13.7 ± 0.6 8.7 ± 2.3 - 12.3 ± 2.1 6.7 ± 0.6 10 ± 2.9 11.3 ± 2.3 Talaromyces sp. (EA) - 14.7 ± 1.2 - 17.3 ± 2.1 7.7 ± 2.1 8 ± 1.7 9.7 ± 0.6 Talaromyces sp. (MeoH) 11 ± 1.0 12.7 ± 2.5 18.3 ± 0.6 19 ± 1.0 9.7 ± 0.6 10.3 ± 0.6 10.3 ± 0.6 Positive control 27 ± 1.7 32.3 ± 0.3 26 ± 1.7 32.6 ± 0.3 26 ± 1.7 27 ± 1.7 27 ± 1.7 Bs : Bacillus subtilis , Sa : Staphylococcus aureus , Kp : Klebsiella pneumoniae , Ec: Escherichia coli , Pa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Mb: Mycobacterium bovis and Ms: Mycobacterium smegmatis . Positive control: Rifampicin (40 µ g / mL). *: mean diameter on zone of inhibition ± Standard Deviation ( n = 3). -: no zones of inhibition were observed 3.6. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of the Crude Extracts The MIC values ranged from 0.006 mg / mL to 8 mg / mL (Table 5 ). The crude extract of P. leucadendri (6 µ g / mL) had the lowest MIC against K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and M. bovis , while it showed the highest MIC value of 2.91 mg / mL against M. smegmatis .

[[[ p. 7 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 7 of 11 Table 5. Minimum inhibitory concentrating assay of the fungal secondary metabolites Crude Extracts of the Fungal Endophytes Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (mg / mL) Gram Positive Gram Negative Acid-Fast Stain Bs Sa Ko Kp Ec Pa Mb Ms A. pullulans 2.13 2.13 2.13 0.17 2.13 0.17 0.17 0.17 P. leucadendri 1.16 2.33 1.16 0.006 1.16 0.006 0.006 2.91 Cladosporium sp 6.37 1.28 6.38 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 1.28 Fusarium sp 0.03 5 1.25 0.009 1.25 0.009 0.009 0.009 Hyalodendriella sp 7.38 1.48 1.48 0.03 5 0.03 0.03 0.03 P. chrysogenum ( fruit ) 5.75 1.15 5.57 0.02 5 0.02 0.02 0.02 P. chrysogenum ( leaves ) 0.75 6 3 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Talaromyces sp 1.69 3.38 1.35 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 Positive control * 0.0019 0.0019 0.0019 0.0019 0.0019 0.0019 0.0019 0.0019 Negative control † 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bs : Bacillus subtilis , Sa : Staphylococcus aureus , Ko : Klebsiella oxytoca , Kp : Klebsiella pneumoniae , Ec : Escherichia coli , Pa : Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Mb : Mycobacterium bovis and Ms : Mycobacterium smegmatis . Positive control *: Rifampicin (40 µ g / mL). Negative control † : DMSO (10%) 4. Discussion In this study, fungal endophytes were isolated and identified from Solanum mauritianum , an invasive plant from South America and weed in South Africa that is facing extermination [ 25 ]. We did not find any previous studies on the isolation of fungal endophytes from S. mauritianum , and this is the first time we report a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium smegmatis from extracts of fungal endophytes isolated from S. mauritianum . The fungal diversity analysis reveals a mixed composition of the endophyte community from the leaves, ripe and unripe fruits and stem of Solanum mauritianum . Out of the nine fungal endophytes that were isolated from a healthy plant of Solanum mauritianum , Penicillium chrysogenum was isolated twice in di ff erent parts of the plant, with the unripe fruit and leaves’ endophytes showing di ff erent growth patterns Paracamarosporium leucadendri, Cladosporium sp., Collectotrichum sp., Fusarium sp., Hyalodendriella sp., Talaromyces sp., and Penicillium sp. [ 11 , 26 – 33 ], have been identified as plant endophytes, proving that they are not plant pathogens The results of the phylogenetic analysis show distinct clustering of the isolates at 94–100% similarities. Analysis of the ITS 1 and ITS 4 rDNA reveals that the most prevalent endophytic fungi was Penicillium chrysogenum (22.2%), isolated from the leaves and unripe fruits, Fusarium sp. (11.1%) and Paracamarosporium leucadendri (11.1%). The similarities of the sequences obtained ranged from 94–100% Currently there is growing interest on the endophytic microorganisms, producing a wide range of compounds with diverse biological activities [ 34 ]. The results of the disc di ff usion assay showed inhibition by all nine fungal endophyte crude extracts on all the test bacteria. There are many studies in literature on penicillin as the most important antibiotic and as the first discovered antibiotic in history [ 35 – 38 ] successfully used to treat bacterial infections and has been isolated from the fungus P. chrysogenum [ 35 ]. The endophytic fungi P. chrysogenum crude extract showed potential as an antibiotic with a broad-spectrum antimicrobial e ff ect in this study Aureobasidium pullulans was also isolated in our study; it has previously been reported to synthesize biomolecules of medicinal importance, for example, β -(1 → 3, 1 → 6)-glucans, which displays anti-tumour, immune-modulatory and food allergy inhibition [ 39 ], fungicide [ 40 ] and antimicrobial activity [ 41 ]. It also shows fungicide and fungicidal properties against Candida albicans [ 42 ]. The lowest MIC observed from A. pullulans was 0.17 mg / mL Hyalodendriella sp., has been reported to contain bioactive properties that inhibit bacterial growth [ 28 , 43 ] and fungal growth [ 44 ]. This validates the results we obtained in this study, that fungal endophytes from plants have the potential to inhibit microorganisms other than bacteria, such as fungi.

[[[ p. 8 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 8 of 11 Rodriguez et al. [ 45 ] reported Fusarium sp. to have resistance against virulent pathogens, as well as anticancer properties [ 45 , 46 ], anti-inflammatory, antitussive (to prevent or relieve a cough) and anti-allergic properties. In our study, Fusarium sp. secondary metabolite extracts showed greater activity on 4 microorganisms, including M. bovis and M. smegmatis This is noteworthy as there are no reports on Fusarium sp. having antagonistic properties against mycobacteria The production of saponins by the fungal endophyte Paracamarosporium leucadendri has been previously reported [ 11 ]. Sharma et al. [ 47 ] reported the bioactivity of an ethyl acetate extract on two Gram negative and two Gram positive organisms at a concentration of 25 mg / mL. In our study we observed the activity of ethyl acetate extracts from P. leucadendri against K. pneumonia, P. aeruginosa and M. bovis at the lowest concentration of 6 µ g / mL. These results, are indicative of yet unidentified active principals in the extract Several bioactive secondary metabolites such as anthraquinone [ 48 ] and alkaloids [ 49 ] have been isolated and reported from Talaromyces sp., [ 50 ], with even newer compounds such as penicillic acid emerging due to co-culturing with Fusarium solani and other fungal endophytes [ 30 ]. In our study Talaromyces sp. showed inhibition at 30 µ g / mL against E. coli , K. pneumonia , P. aeruginosa , M. bovis and M. smegmatis . The fungal endophyte Penicillium chrysogenum isolated from the leaves showed activity at the lowest MIC activity (10 µ g / mL) against Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium smegmatis , while Fusarium sp. showed activity at the lowest MIC against Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium smegmatis (9 µ g / mL) with P. leucadendri (6 µ g / mL) showing the lowest MIC concentration against Mycobacterium bovis . This is encouraging because, according to Rios and Recio [ 51 ], natural product compounds that show antimicrobial activity at ≤ 10 µ g / mL and 100 µ g / mL for extracts should be considered noteworthy As such, in this case, A. pullulans , Cladosporium sp., Fusarium sp., Hyalodendriella sp., P. chrysogenum (L), P. chrysogenum (F), P. leucadendri, and Talaromyces sp. have notable secondary metabolites It has been demonstrated that some compounds of plants origin are produced by fungal endophytes of that plant, and some of the biological activity of the plants can be found in their endophytes [ 50 ]. Fungi are known for their extraordinary contribution to drug production, as well as in managing diseases in animals and humans, as they produce a large variety of secondary metabolites of commercial and medicinal importance Ethyl acetate extracts of all fungal endophytes showed activities against S. aureus , E. coli and M. bovis , with zones of inhibition of 7 mm while that of A. pullulans on B. subtilis was 19 mm. Other endophytic fungal extracts may have bioactive compounds in smaller amounts, and it is possible that the crude extracts could give more potent compounds once they have undergone further purification 5. Conclusions Some isolated endophytes in the study, P. leucadendri and Fusarium sp. may contain novel bioactive compounds that can be used against tuberculosis. Further studies on cytotoxicity and purification of the compounds still need to be evaluated. The potential of these fungal endophytes is of great interest, but further studies are required Author Contributions: S.P. did the experimental work and wrote the draft manuscript. E.G. drafted the manuscript, gave critical comments to improve the manuscript, and made financial contribution to the study. V.M. designed the study and contributed financially towards the identification of fungal endophytes by Inqaba Biotec Africa’s Genomics Company (Pretoria, South Africa), and data was analysed under their supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript Funding: This study was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa [Grant number: 112855. Funders had no role in study design, data collection, results analysis or the decision to submit this work for publication Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

[[[ p. 9 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 9 of 11 References 1 Vega, F.E.; Posada, F.; Aime, M.C.; Pava-Ripoll, M.; Infante, F.; Rehner, S.A. Entomopathogenic fungal endophytes Biol. Control 2008 , 46 , 72–82. [ CrossRef ] 2 Singh, L.P.; Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Unraveling the role of fungal symbionts in plant abiotic stress tolerance Plant. Signal. Behav 2011 , 6 , 175–191. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 3 Kaul, S.; Ahmed, M.; Zargar, K.; Sharma, P.; Dhar, M. Prospecting endophytic fungal assemblage of digitalis lanata-Ehrh. (foxglove) as a novel source of digoxin: A cardiac glycoside 3 Biotech 2013 , 3 , 335–340 [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 4 Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA 7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets Mol. Biol. Evolut 2016 , 33 , 1870–1874. [ CrossRef ] 5 Kumar, G.; Chandra, P.; Choudhary, M. Endophytic Fungi: A Potential Source of Bioactive Compounds Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett 2017 , 6 , 2373–2381 6 Strobel, G. The Emergence of Endophytic Microbes and Their Biological Promise J. Fungi 2018 , 4 , 57 [ CrossRef ] 7 Kusari, S.; Singh, S.; Jayabaskaran, C. Rethinking production of Taxol (Paclitaxel) using endophyte biotechnology Trends Biotechnol 2014 , 32 , 304–311. [ CrossRef ] 8 Kusari, S.; Hertweck, C.; Spiteller, M. Chemical ecology of endophytic fungi: Origins of secondary metabolites Chem. Biol 2012 , 19 , 792–798. [ CrossRef ] 9 Kumar, D.; Chadda, S.; Sharma, J.; Surain, P. Syntheses, spectral characterization, and antimicrobial studies on the coordination compounds of metal ions with schi ff base containing both aliphatic and aromatic hydrazide moieties Bioinorg. Chem. Appl 2013 , 1–10. [ CrossRef ] 10 Ahmed, M.; Hussain, M.; Dhar, M.K.; Kaul, S. Isolation of microbial endophytes from some ethnomedicinal plants of Jammu and Kashmir J. Nat. Prod. Plant. Resour 2012 , 2 , 215–220 11 Wu, H.; Yang, H.; You, X.; Li, Y. Isolation and characterization of saponin-producing fungal endophytes from Aralia elata in Northeast China Int. J. Mol. Sci 2012 , 13 , 16255–16266. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 12 El-Hawary, S.S.; Mohammed, R.; AbouZid, S.F.; Bakeer, W.; Ebel, R.; Sayed, A.M.; Rateb, M.E. Solamargine production by a fungal endophyte of solanum nigrum J. Appl. Microbiol 2016 , 120 , 900–911. [ CrossRef ] 13 Le Tuan Anh, H.; Tran, P.T.; Thao, D.T.; Trang, D.T.; Dang, N.H.; Van Cuong, P.; Kiem, P.V.; Minh, C.V.; Lee, J. Degalactotigonin, a steroidal glycoside from Solanum nigrum , induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest via inhibiting the EGFR signaling pathways in pancreatic cancer cells BioMed. Res. Int 2018 , 2018 , 1–9 [ CrossRef ] 14 Huang, W.Y.Y.Z.; Cai, J.; Xing, H.; Corke, H.; Sun, M. A potential antioxidant resource: Endophytic fungi isolated from traditional Chinese medicinal plants Econ. Botany 2007 , 61 , 14–30. [ CrossRef ] 15 Larran, S.; Perell ó , A.; Sim ó n, M.R.; Moreno, V. The endophytic fungi from wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2007 , 36 , 565–572. [ CrossRef ] 16 Katoch, M.; Phull, S.; Vaid, S.; Singh, S. Diversity, phylogeny, anticancer and antimicrobial potential of fungal endophytes associated with Monarda Citriodora , L BMC Microbiol 2017 , 17 , 17–44. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 17 White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols. A Guide to Methods and Applications ; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990 18 Stephen, F.; Altschul, T.L.; Madden, A.A.; Schaumle ff er, J.Z.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; David, J. Lipman Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs Nucleic Acids Res 1997 , 25 , 3389–3402 19 Hall, T. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95 / 98 / NT Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser 1999 , 41 , 95–98 20 National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI), GenBank. Available online: https: // www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov / genbank / update / (accessed on 4 October 2017) 21 Varanda, C.M.R.; Oiveira, M.; Materatski, P.; Landum, M.; Clara, M.I.E.; do Ros á rio F é lix, M. Fungal endophytic communities associated to the phyllosphere of grapevine cultivars under di ff erent types of management Fungal Biol 2016 , 120 , 1525–1536. [ CrossRef ] 22 Kumar, S.; Tamura, K.; Nei, M. MEGA 3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment Brief Bioinform 2004 , 5 , 150–163. [ CrossRef ]

[[[ p. 10 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 10 of 11 23 Marcellano, J.P.; Collanto, A.S.; Fuentes, R.G. Antibacterial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from the bark of Cinnamomum Merc Pharmacol. J 2017 , 9 , 405–409 24 Chien, H.T.; Nazni, W.A.; Nurulhusna, A.H.; Norazah, A.; Han, L.L. Determination of antibacterial activity and minimum inhibitory concentration of larval extract of fly via resazurin-based turbidometric assay BMC Microbiol 2017 , 36 , 171–178 25 Oclkers, T. Biological control of Solanum mauritianum Scop. ( Solanaceae ) in South Africa: Will perseverance pay o ff ? Afr. Entomol 2011 , 19 , 416–426 26 Hormazabal, E.; Piontelli, E. Fungal endophytes from Chilean native gymnosperms: Antimicrobial activity against human and phytopathogenic fungi World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2009 , 25 , 813–819. [ CrossRef ] 27 Meng, X.; Mao, Z.; Lou, J.; Xu, L.; Zhong, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, M. Benzopyranones from the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef 12 and their bioactivities Molecules 2012 , 17 , 11303–11314 [ CrossRef ] 28 Zhao, H.; Wu, L.; Chai, T.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, J.; Ma, S. The e ff ects of copper, manganese and zinc on plant growth and elemental accumulation in the manganese-hyperaccumulator Phytolacca americana J. Plant. Pysiol 2012 , 169 , 1243–1252. [ CrossRef ] 29 Chen, M.; Han, L.; Shao, C.; She, Z.; Wang, C. Bioactive diphenyl ether derivatives from a gorgonian-derived fungus Talaromyces sp Chem. Biodivers 2015 , 12 , 443–450. [ CrossRef ] 30 Nonaka, K.; Chiba, T.; Suga, T.; Asami, Y.; Iwatsuki, M.; Masuma, R.; Omura, S.; Shiomi, K. Coculnol, a new penicillic acid produced by a coculture of Fusarium solani FKI-6853 and Talaromyces sp. FKA-65 J. Antibiot 2015 , 68 , 530–532. [ CrossRef ] 31 Anand, B.G.; Thomas, C.K.N.; Prakash, S. In vitro cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of Talaromyces flavus SP 5 inhabited in the marine sediment of Southern Coast of India Chin. J. Nat. Med 2016 , 14 , 913–921 [ CrossRef ] 32 Parsa, S.; Garcea-Lemos, A.M.; Castillo, K.; Ortiz, V.; Lopez-Lavalle, L.A.; Braun, J.; Vega, F.E. Fungal endophytes in germinated seeds of the common bean, Phaseolus vulg Fungal Boil 2016 , 120 , 783–790 [ CrossRef ] 33 Akinsanya, M.A.; Goh, J.K.; Lim, S.P.; Ting, A.S.Y. Metagenomics study of endophytic bacteria in Aloe vera using next-generation technology Genom. Data 2015 , 6 , 159–163. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 34 Rodriguez, R.J.; White, J.F., Jr.; Arnold, A.E.; Redman, R.S. Fungal endophytes: Diversity and functional roles New Phytol 2009 , 182 , 314–330. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 35 Al-Fakih, A.; Almaqtri, W.Q.A. Overview on antibacterial metabolites from terrestrial Aspergillus spp Mycology 2019 , 10 , 191–209. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 36 Ergin, F.; Yildiz, G.; Gocer, E.M.C.; Kucukcetin, A. Use of bacteriophages as antimicrobial agents Akade Gida 2017 , 15 , 172–181 37 Wainwright, M. Who witnessed the discovery of penicillin? Biologist 2005 , 52 , 234–237 38 Bentley, R. Di ff erent roads to discovery; prontosil (hence sulfa drugs) and penicillin (hence-lactams) J. Ind Microbiol. Biotechnol 2009 , 36 , 775–786. [ CrossRef ] 39 Kono, H.; Kondo, N.; Hirabayashi, K.; Ogata, M.; Totani, K.; Ikematsu, S.; Osada, M. NMR spectroscopic structural characterization of a water-soluble β -(1 → 3, 1 → 6)-glucan from Aureobasidium pullulans Carbohydr. Polym 2017 , 17 , 876–886. [ CrossRef ] 40 Muramatsu, D.; Iwai, A.; Aoki, S.; Uchiyama, H.; Kawata, K.; Nakayama, Y.; Nikawa, Y.; Kusano, K.; Okabe, M.; Miyazaki, T β -glucan derived from Aureobasidium pullulans is e ff ective for the prevention of influenza in mice PLoS ONE 2012 , 7 , 1–9. [ CrossRef ] 41 Wang, W.L.; Chi, Z.M.; Chi, Z.; Li, J.; Wang, X.H. Siderophore production by the marine-derived Aureobasidium pullulans and its antimicrobial activity Bioresour. Technol 2009 , 100 , 2639–2641. [ CrossRef ] 42 De Lucca, A.J. Antifungal peptides: Potential candidates for the treatment of fungal infections Expert Opin Investig. Drugs 2000 , 9 , 273–299. [ CrossRef ] 43 Mao, Z.; Lai, D.; Liu, X.; Fu, X.; Meng, J.; Wang, A.; Wang, X.; Sun, W.; Liu, Z.L.; Zhou, L.; et al. Dibenzo-a-pyrones: A new class of larvicidal metabolites against Aedes aegypti from the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef 12 Pest. Manag. Sci 2017 , 73 , 1478–1485. [ CrossRef ] 44 Rodriguez, R.; Redman, R. More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can’t make it on their own: Plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis J. Exp. Bot 2008 , 59 , 1109–1114. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]

[[[ p. 11 ]]]

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 439 11 of 11 45 Arora, J.; Ramawat, K.G.; Maheshwari, D.K. An Introduction to Endophytes. In Endophytes: Biology and Biotechnology ; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1–23 46 Shankar Naik, B.; Krishnappa, M.; Krishnamurthy, Y. Biodiversity of fungal endophytes from seven herbaceous medicinal plants of Malnad region, Western Ghats, Southern India J. For. Res 2014 , 25 , 707–711 [ CrossRef ] 47 Sharma, N.; Jandaik, S.; Kumar, S.; Chitkara, M.; Sandhu, I.S. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of manganeseand iron-doped zinc oxide nanoparticles J. Exp. Nanosci 2016 , 11 , 54–71. [ CrossRef ] 48 Xie, X.; Fang, X.; Huang, R.; Zhang, S.; Wei, H.; Wu, S. A new dimeric anthraquinone from endophytic Talaromyces sp. YE 3016 Nat. Product Res 2016 , 30 , 1706–1711. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 49 Liu, F.; Cai, X.; Yang, H.; Xia, X.; Guo, Z.; Yuan, J.; Li, M.; She, Z.; Lin, Y. The bioactive metabolites of the mangrove endophytic fungus Talaromyces sp. ZH-154 isolated from Kandelia candel (L.) druce Planta Med 2010 , 76 , 185–189. [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] 50 Yang, H.; Li, F.; Ji, N. Alkaloids from an algicolous strain of Talaromyces sp Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol 2016 , 34 , 367–371. [ CrossRef ] 51 Rios, J.L.; Recio, M.C. Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activity J. Ethnopharmacol 2005 , 100 , 80–84 [ CrossRef ] © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http: // creativecommons.org / licenses / by / 4.0 / ).

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: