Further nomenclatural changes in indian homoeopathic medicinal plants
Journal name: Ancient Science of Life
Original article title: Further nomenclatural changes in indian homoeopathic medicinal plants
The ANSCI is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focused on Ayurveda and traditional medicines. It publishes original research, reviews, and literary studies linking traditional knowledge with modern science, covering disciplines like botany, ethnomedicine, pharmacology, and clinical research.
This page presents a generated summary with additional references; See source (below) for actual content.
Original source:
This page is merely a summary which is automatically generated hence you should visit the source to read the original article which includes the author, publication date, notes and references.
D. Suresh Baburaj, S.S Nain
Ancient Science of Life:
(A quarterly multi-disciplinary scientific research journal in Ayurveda)
Full text available for: Further nomenclatural changes in indian homoeopathic medicinal plants
Year: 1992
Copyright (license): CC BY-NC-SA
Download the PDF file of the original publication
Summary of article contents:
Introduction
The paper focuses on the further nomenclatural changes in Indian homeopathic medicinal plants, primarily in the Nilgiri District of Tamil Nadu, which is recognized as one of the most botanised regions in Southern India. Despite its extensive botanical studies, several wild and exotic plants significant to alternative medicine remain uncollected and unpreserved. The authors present a list of 34 species used in homeopathy across 31 genera and 23 families—emphasizing the need for proper identification and nomenclature in pharmacognostic standardization and research.
Importance of Nomenclature in Homeopathy
The adherence to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature is critical for ensuring that medicinal plants used in homeopathy are accurately identified. This paper emphasizes that establishing the correct names for these plants has led to changes in nomenclature, clarifying their taxonomic status. Previous research documented 58 species and their valid names, serving as a basis for the current paper’s findings. Additionally, the authors provide valid names along with basionyms to enhance the clarity and understanding of prescribed drugs used in homeopathy, illustrating how historical names correspond to contemporary taxonomic standards.
Conclusion
This study contributes significantly to the field of botany and homeopathy by addressing the gaps in previous research regarding the identification of medicinal plants. The authors express gratitude to those who provided support, including the Central Council for Research in Homeopathy and various scientists, highlighting the collaborative efforts involved in enhancing botanical knowledge. Ultimately, the work underscores the necessity for ongoing research and documentation of medicinal plants to preserve their significance in traditional medicine systems.
FAQ section (important questions/answers):
What is the focus of the paper by D. Suresh Baburaj?
The paper surveys medicinal plants used in homeopathy in Nilgiri District, Tamil Nadu, listing 34 species along with their nomenclature references, highlighting discrepancies in existing plant classifications and the importance of accurate plant identification.
What methodology is used for plant nomenclature changes?
Changes in nomenclature adhere to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, reflecting updated classifications based on taxonomic research. This ensures that the plants utilized in homeopathy maintain valid historical and botanical names.
How many plant species are documented in this paper?
The paper documents 34 species of plants used in homeopathy, coming from 31 genera across 23 different families, indicating the diversity of flora that has medicinal applications in homeopathic practices.
Who provided support for the research in the paper?
The authors acknowledge the support of the Director of the Central Council for Research in Homeopathy and Dr. E. Vajravelu from the Botanical Survey of India, who provided resources and valuable feedback on the manuscript.
Glossary definitions and references:
Scientific and Ayurvedic Glossary list for “Further nomenclatural changes in indian homoeopathic medicinal plants”. This list explains important keywords that occur in this article and links it to the glossary for a better understanding of that concept in the context of Ayurveda and other topics.
1) Drug:
A drug is a medicinal substance used to treat, cure, prevent, or diagnose disease. In homeopathy, the correct identification and nomenclature of a drug, which corresponds to its Latin binomial name, are crucial. The paper discusses various plants utilized in homeopathy and their associated drug names.
2) Science (Scientific):
Science is the systematic pursuit of knowledge through observation and experimentation. This paper exemplifies scientific inquiry by employing botanical classification to explore medicinal plants used in homeopathy. By adhering to scientific standards, such as the International Code of Nomenclature, the study promotes a structured approach to identifying herbal medicines.
3) Medicine:
Medicine encompasses various practices aimed at maintaining or restoring health. The paper focuses on homeopathic medicine, which relies on the use of specific plant species. An accurate understanding of plant identities enhances medicinal efficacy and safety in homeopathic treatments, emphasizing the importance of correct nomenclature and classification.
4) Curcuma longa:
Curcuma longa, commonly known as turmeric, is a significant medicinal plant used in homeopathy. The relevance of this species lies in its recognized health benefits and usage in treatments. The paper's documentation highlights the importance of accurate scientific naming and reference within homeopathic literature related to this species.
5) Pharmacology:
Pharmacology studies the interactions between drugs and biological systems. In this paper, pharmacognostic standardization is crucial for homeopathic remedies. Understanding the pharmacological properties of identified plant species supports the development of effective treatments and the correct application of remedies derived from these plants based on scientific principles.
6) Mahendra (Māhendra, Mahemdra, Maha-indra):
Mahendra refers to Hari Mahendra, an author cited within the paper who contributed to the documentation and categorization of medicinal plants. His work aids in the identification and verification of plant species, suggesting that collaboration among experts leads to enhanced understanding and more precise classification within the field of botany.
7) Himalaya (Himālaya, Hima-alaya):
The Himalaya region is noted for its rich biodiversity, hosting numerous medicinal plants. The paper references Himalayan flora as essential for homeopathic practices. The distinct ecological characteristics of this region contribute to the varieties of plants studied, reinforcing the significance of localized knowledge in herbal medicine and plant taxonomy.
8) Botany:
Botany is the scientific study of plants, crucial for understanding their properties and uses. In this context, the authors focus on the botanical classification of plants utilized in homeopathy, illustrating how accurate identification is fundamental for pharmacognostic purposes and ensuring the effectiveness of plant-derived remedies in medical practices.
9) Amara (Amarā, Amāra):
Amara, usually referring to the bitter taste, might also denote specific plant species in medicinal contexts. In the documentation of homeopathic medicine, understanding the implications of 'amara' relates to identifying plants that bear such characteristics, thus emphasizing the importance of plant properties in determining their therapeutic applications.
10) Guha (Guhā, Gūhā):
Guha likely refers to D. N. Guha Bakshi, an author whose works are referenced in the paper. His research contributes to the documentation of flora, particularly in regions like West Bengal. The acknowledgment of such authors highlights the collaborative nature of botanical studies and the importance of cumulative academic efforts.
11) Hari (Hāri, Hārin, Harī, Harin):
In this context, Hari refers to one of the authors or contributors involved in relevant botanical research. Recognizing individuals like Hari signifies the collaborative efforts in exploring medicinal plants and reinforces the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in enhancing our understanding and application of plant-based medicines from a scientific standpoint.
12) Resa (Resā, Resha):
Resa refers to 'Resa' in the context of 'Dagbok Ostind Resa,' which is a historical document. Its mention implies a link to explorative research in historic botany, suggesting that understanding the historical context and records enriches current knowledge about medicinal plants used in homeopathic practices and their treatments.
13) Hand:
In botanical and medicinal contexts, 'hand' might refer to the handling or practical application of plant materials. The study emphasizes the need for meticulous identification and classification, implying that practical validation of plant uses in homeopathy requires careful handling and knowledge to ensure accurate application in medical therapies.
Other Science Concepts:
Discover the significance of concepts within the article: ‘Further nomenclatural changes in indian homoeopathic medicinal plants’. Further sources in the context of Science might help you critically compare this page with similair documents:
Pharmacognostic standardization, Flora of Tamil Nadu, Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of India, Flora of British India.