Trishashti Shalaka Purusha Caritra

by Helen M. Johnson | 1931 | 742,503 words

This page describes Narada’s birth which is the eleventh part of chapter II of the English translation of the Jain Ramayana, contained within the “Trishashti Shalaka Purusha Caritra”: a massive Jain narrative relgious text composed by Hemacandra in the 12th century. This Jain Ramayana contains the biographies of Rama, Lakshmana, Ravana, Naminatha, Harishena-cakravartin and Jaya-cakravartin: all included in the list of 63 illustrious beings or worthy persons.

Marutta bowed to Rāvaṇa and said, “Who is this ocean of compassion who stopped us from that sin through you, master?”

Rāvaṇa replied: “There was a Brāhman, Brahmaruci, who was an ascetic. His wife, Kūrmī, became pregnant. One day some monks came there and one of them said: ‘It was, indeed, well done, that living in a house was abandoned from fear of worldly existence. How, pray, does living in a forest differ from living in a house, if you have relations with your wife again, your mind injured by sense-objects?’

Hearing that, Brahmaruci accepted the teaching of the Jinas and became a mendicant at once and Kūrmī became a laywoman next. Devoid of false belief, living there in the hermitage, she bore a son who was exempt from crying, etc, named Nārada. When she had gone somewhere else (one day), the Jṛmbhaka gods kidnaped him. Because of sorrow for the boy, she became a mendicant under Indumālā. The gods took care of him and taught him the sciences; and in course of time gave him the vidyā ‘going through the air.’ Observing the lesser vows, he reached charming youth. As he always wore the topknot, he was neither householder nor ascetic. Eager to watch quarrels, interested in singing and dancing, he was always very devoted to bad conduct and talkativeness about love. The creator of peace and dissension between heroes and lovers, with an umbrella under his arm ānd his mat in his hand, elevated on shoes, because he had been reared by the gods Nārada became known on earth as a god-ṛṣi, a celibate in general[1] and doing as he pleased.”

Footnotes and references:


I.e., he was a celibate, but did not observe all tbe details of the strict celibacy of monks.

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: