Analysis of traditions in Futuh al-Buldan.
Journal name: Acta Orientalia
Original article title: A contribution to and analysis of the traditions contained in the Futuh al-Buldan
ACTA ORIENTALIA is a journal focused on the study of Oriental languages, history, archaeology, and religions from ancient times to the present. The journal includes articles reviewed by a senior scholar in the relevant field.
This page presents a generated summary with additional references; See source (below) for actual content.
Original source:
This page is merely a summary which is automatically generated hence you should visit the source to read the original article which includes the author, publication date, notes and references.
Jørgen Simonsen
Acta Orientalia:
(Founded in 1922 and published annually)
Full text available for: A contribution to and analysis of the traditions contained in the Futuh al-Buldan
Year: 1957 | Doi: 10.5617/ao.5310
Copyright (license): CC BY 4.0
Download the PDF file of the original publication
Summary of article contents:
1) Introduction
Jørgen Simonsen's analysis focuses on the traditions found in Ahmad ibn Yahya al-Baladhuri's Futuh al-Buldan, highlighting the text's significance as an early Islamic historical source. While historians like al-Mas'udi and Yaqut praise Baladhuri's contributions, the trustworthiness of his traditions has not been thoroughly examined. Simonsen seeks to evaluate the authenticity of these traditions by comparing them with older works, particularly those by Ibn Ishaq and al-Waqidi, focusing on concepts such as the conquest narratives of various tribes, the legal implications within the traditions, and the methodologies employed by historians in this period.
2) The Conveyance of Traditions from Earlier Sources
One critical concept discussed is the transmission of traditions concerning the conquest of Khaybar, where Simonsen outlines how traditions from Ibn Ishaq's Sira and Yahya ibn Adam's Kitab al-Kharadj are interconnected. In reviewing the isnad (chain of transmission) and matn (text), he observes that Baladhuri follows Yahya's account closely, often quoting it verbatim. Differences in wording are minimal, suggesting that Baladhuri relied on Yahya’s interpretations for significant portions of his work. This reveals a pattern of tradition transmission, where slight modifications occur due to context or because histories are repackaged for specific legal or political narratives.
3) Examination of Banu al-Nadir Traditions
Another point of emphasis is the traditions regarding Banu al-Nadir, where Simonsen provides analysis comparing the texts in Yahya ibn Adam's and al-Waqidi's works. He notes that Baladhuri's tradition mirrors al-Waqidi's description closely and argues that this tradition showcases the `juridical` nature of the information selected by Baladhuri. Understanding the context of these traditions is crucial for scholars, as Baladhuri appears to meticulously choose segments that emphasize legal standings and omits broader historical assertions. This approach indicates a purposeful inclination towards legal documentation over narrative history.
4) The Context of Traditions About Fadak and Their Legal Framework
The traditions regarding Fadak offer another layer of complexity. Simonsen elaborates on how Yahya ibn Adam presents two traditions related to Fadak, which are essential for understanding its integration into the Islamic legal framework. Here, similarly to the other analyzed traditions, Baladhuri adopts Yahya's renditions predominantly without alteration, underscoring his adherence to authoritative sources while also enriching the legal discourse surrounding Islamic land allocation and Jewish integration into Islamic rule. Notably, this selective representation underscores the legalistic focus present in Baladhuri’s methodology.
5) Conclusion
In conclusion, Simonsen asserts that Baladhuri's Futuh al-Buldan is primarily a construction rooted in legal traditions, deliberately shaped by Iraqi jurists in the late eighth century. Through careful analysis of isnads and matns, he demonstrates that Baladhuri's work significantly reflects the historical context of its authorship, attempting to align Islamic governance with prophetic decisions. Simonsen's study presents a nuanced view of early Islamic historiography, indicating a sophisticated interplay between legal development and historical narrative within the traditions, ultimately reinforcing the importance of source selection and transmission pathways in Islamic historiography.
FAQ section (important questions/answers):
What is the significance of Ahmad ibn Yahya al-Baladhuri's Futuh al-Buldan?
Futuh al-Buldan is considered a crucial source for early Islamic history, detailing the Islamic expansion. Scholars like al-Mas'udi and Wüstenfeld recognize its authority and significance in understanding complex historical events.
How does the text analyze Baladhuri's trustworthiness?
The analysis compares traditions in Futuh al-Buldan with earlier sources, particularly Ibn Ishaq's Sira and al-Waqidi's Kitab al-Maghazi, to assess Baladhuri's reliability in relaying historical information, showing careful referencing and variations.
Which sources does Baladhuri primarily rely on for his traditions?
Baladhuri mostly draws from Ibn Ishaq's Sira via Yahya ibn Adam’s Kitab al-Kharadj, specifically for traditions about key events like Khaybar, Banu al-Nadir, and Fadak, with careful attention to the isnads.
What is the main concern of Baladhuri's work?
Baladhuri’s work focuses on juridical information, emphasizing how localities were incorporated into the Arab empire, often omitting broader historical context while aiming to present an idealized view of early Islamic governance.
Why are abbreviations present in Baladhuri's citations?
Baladhuri abbreviates traditions to create a more focused narrative on juridical aspects, without altering the core legal meanings, which indicates his intent to streamline historical information for clarity and relevance.
How does the text evaluate Baladhuri's treatment of sources?
The analysis concludes that Baladhuri uses his sources with care, ensuring accurate transmission of traditions while often omitting information from Yahya ibn Adam that doesn't align with his specific focus on juridical details.
Glossary definitions and references:
Oriental and Historical glossary list for “Analysis of traditions in Futuh al-Buldan.”. This list explains important keywords that occur in this article and links it to the glossary for a better understanding of that concept in the context of History, Linguistics, Religion, Philosophy, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism etc.
1) Atam:
In the context of Islamic tradition, Adam refers to Yahya ibn Adam, a significant jurist and traditionist whose works, particularly Kitab al-Kharadj, provide essential insights into the practices and legal frameworks during the early Islamic period. His transmission of hadith is crucial for understanding the historical context of the expansions and regulations established by the Prophet Muhammad.
2) Sira (Shira):
Sira refers to the biographical accounts of the Prophet Muhammad, notably the work by Ibn Ishaq. It serves as a key source for Islamic history and traditions, providing narratives about the Prophet’s life, actions, and the context of the early Islamic community, from which later scholars drew upon for further analyses and interpretations.
3) Death:
Death in the context of the text often signifies the passing of key historical figures, such as traditionists or jurists, whose contributions shaped the transmission of Islamic knowledge. The mention of specific deaths serves to establish chronological connections within the isnads (chains of transmission) vital for validating traditions in Islamic scholarship.
4) Sura (Shura):
A Sura is a chapter of the Quran, the holy book of Islam. The mention of specific suras in the text reflects the legal and theological references evident in the traditions being analyzed. These references help to contextualize various rulings and decisions made during the early Islamic expansions and legal developments.
5) Trustworthiness:
Trustworthiness is a critical measure in evaluating the reliability of historical sources and the traditions within the Islamic scholarly community. The text discusses the trustworthiness of Baladhuri's work in comparison to earlier sources, emphasizing the need for researchers to discern the validity and authenticity of transmitted information.
6) Transmission:
Transmission refers to the process by which hadith and historical accounts are passed down through generations via specified chains of narrators (isnad). The text examines how certain traditions were transmitted, noting the significance of accuracy and fidelity in ensuring that the information reflects the original accounts of early Islamic events.
7) Construction (Constructed, Constructing):
Constructed refers to the deliberate process of forming traditions by selecting specific details or legal references from original sources. The text indicates how jurists like Yahya ibn Adam crafted new narratives that reflect particular legal or historical perspectives, which may not align entirely with traditional accounts.
8) Conquest:
Conquest pertains to the military campaigns undertaken during the early expansion of Islam, as documented in works like Futuh al-Buldan. The description of these conquests is central to understanding how new territories were integrated into the Islamic state, including the legal implications and administrative practices that followed.
9) Three turnings (Three stages):
Three stages denote the levels of transmission for traditions originating from Ibn Ishaq's Sira as analyzed in the text. This framework allows for a comparative analysis of the evolution and modifications of specific narratives, shedding light on how and when these traditions were adapted or altered over time.
10) Two stages:
Two stages refer to the similar evaluative process for traditions derived from al-Waqidi's Kitab al-Maghazi. This comparison provides insights into the transmission dynamics and the impact of different narrators on the preservation and alteration of hadith as they were passed down through generations.
11) Transformation (Transform, Transforming):
Transformation refers to the changes that occur in the content and presentation of traditions as they are adapted over time. The text explores how earlier, coherent prose narratives were modified into distinct traditions for legal and historical purposes, showcasing the evolving nature of Islamic scholarship.
12) Instruction:
Instruction pertains to the teachings and legal directives derived from Islamic texts and traditions. The preservation of instructional content plays a significant role in shaping the practices and beliefs of the Muslim community, with the text illustrating how Baladhuri emphasized juridical aspects over other themes.
13) Philosophy:
Philosophy reflects the intellectual discourse within the Islamic tradition, particularly regarding legal reasoning and the relationship between divine revelation and human understanding. The text elucidates how philosophical influences, such as those from the Mu'tazila movement, affected historical writing and the development of Islamic jurisprudence.
14) Knowledge:
Knowledge refers to the understanding and information derived from scholarly works and traditions in Islam. The transmission of knowledge is central to Islamic education and legal practice, as exemplified in Baladhuri's selection of traditions which prioritize specific legal aspects relevant to his audience and context.
15) Existence:
Existence in the overarching narrative signifies the reality of the historical events and figures discussed within the Islamic tradition. The careful documentation and transmission of traditions by scholars were crucial in affirming the existence and significance of early Islamic events and the principles established by the Prophet.
16) Creation:
Creation refers to the acts of establishing narratives and legal frameworks within Islamic scholarship. This process involves the interplay between historical realities, theological principles, and the evolving needs of the community, resulting in texts that aim to reflect divine intentions and historical facts.
17) Branch (Branches):
Branches denote the various aspects and categories of Islamic knowledge and jurisprudence. The diversity in the branches illustrates the nuanced understanding of legal principles and the way they are articulated through the traditions examined, emphasizing the interconnectedness of historical context and legal interpretation.
18) Taraka:
Taraka means 'to leave' or 'to abandon' in Arabic, often referring to how certain practices or traditions might have been disregarded or transformed over time. This concept underscores the dynamism of Islamic jurisprudence and the evolving understandings that persist throughout the historical narrative.
19) Horse:
Horse appears in reference to the division of spoils and military conquests detailed in the traditions of war. The treatment and distribution of horses as part of the spoils highlight the administrative decisions and legal implications of wartime practices within early Islamic governance.
20) Doubt:
Doubt emphasizes the critical assessment of sources and the reliability of traditions. By addressing the potential skepticism regarding certain accounts or interpretations, the text underscores the necessity of rigorous scholarly evaluation to ensure authenticity in Islamic historical writings.
21) Abda:
Abda refers to the notable figures involved in the transmission of Islamic traditions. Their contributions are often scrutinized to establish the reliability of narratives, thereby influencing the interpretation and acceptance of legal rulings within the broader scope of Islamic practice.
22) Book:
Book signifies the various texts, such as the Futuh al-Buldan and Kitab al-Kharadj, that serve as primary sources for Islamic history and jurisprudence. These texts encapsulate the narratives, traditions, and teachings that inform understanding about early Islamic governance and practices.