Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita (comparative study)

by Ranjni M. | 2013 | 54,094 words

This page relates ‘Maya in Agamic Tradition’ of study dealing with Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita. This thesis presents a comparative analysis of two non-dualistic philosophies, Pratyabhijna from Kashmir and Shankara’s Advaita Vedanta from Kerala, highlighting their socio-cultural backgrounds and philosophical similarities..

Go directly to: Footnotes.

Being a pan-Indian concept, Māyā is seen in the non-Vedic religious and ritualistic systems also. In almost all Tantras and Āgamas Māyā is illustrated as ignorance and fascination and thus the cause of the universe. In the non-dual tradition of Āgamas Malinīvijaya, Svacchanda, Vijñānabhairava, Mṛgendra, etc. are important. These treatises, which are considered as the foundation of Pratyabhijñā philosophy, contain detail description on Māyā. Abhinavagupta’s encyclopedic treatise Tantrāloka is composed depending mainly on the Mālinīvijaya. Abhinavagupta states that by depending on the Mālinīvijaya itself he illustrated the nature of Māyā also.[1] In Malinīvijaya Māyā, having two functions Āvaraṇa and Apohana, is illustrated as the cause of the impure creation. It is explained here that after entering into Māyā, for the enjoyment, the Lord created the universe as a tool of enjoyment.[2] Here Māyā is also described as Vyāpinī, Niṣkala, Anavyaya and Ādyantarahita and as the power of Śiva.[3] In Svacchanda Tantra also Māyā is described in the same sense.[4]

Besides the non-dual Śaivāgamas, other treatises like the Śaivasiddhānta texts and the Āgamas widespread in south India also contain the illustration of Māyā. In Kiraṇāgama the second Paṭala is fully devoted to illustrate the nature of Māyā and its effects and is named as Māyāpaṭala. Here also Māyā is considered as the inseparable power of Lord and cause of all worldly beings. It is also conceived as a fascinating principle and as an innate impurity and thus cause of the bondage.[5] Thus as in Vedic literature, in Āgamic literature also the notion of Māyā is seen abundantly.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[2]:

Taittirīyopaniṣad, 2.1.

[3]:

bhūtācca atikrāntāt kālāt bhavyācca bhaviṣyataśca tathā vartamānāt | kālatrayeṇa yanna paricchidyate | Kaṭhopaniṣad-śāṅkara-bhāṣya, 2.14.

[4]:

nirastasarvopādhitvādavyaktamakaraṇagocaram | Bhagavadgītā-śāṅkara-bhāṣya, 12.1.

[5]:

Vide Muṇḍakopaniṣad-śāṅkara-bhāṣya, 3.47; BUSB, 3.9.28. Also vide Taittirīyopaniṣad, 2.1; Chāndogyopaniṣad, 6.2.1-2.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: