Vasistha Dharmasutra

by Georg Bühler | 1882 | 44,713 words

The Dharmasutra of Vasistha forms an independent treatise and has no relationship with the Kalpasutra. The chapters of this text are divided in a way that resemble the practice of later Smritis. This Dharmasutra has a unique characteristic, it cites the opinions of Manu at many places. This led scholars like Bühler among others to form a hypothesis...

1. Let an ascetic depart from his house, giving a promise of safety from injury to all animated beings.[1]

2. Now they quote also (the following verses): 'That ascetic who wanders about at peace with all creatures, forsooth, has nothing to fear from any living being,'[2]

3. 'But he who becomes an ascetic and does not promise safety from injury to all beings, destroys the born and the unborn; and (so does an ascetic) who accepts presents.'[3]

4. Let him discontinue the performance of all religious ceremonies, but let him never discontinue the recitation of the Veda. By neglecting the Veda he becomes a Śūdra; therefore he shall not neglect it.'[4]

5 '(To pronounce) the one syllable (Om) is the best (mode of reciting the) Veda, to suppress the breath is the highest (form of) austerity; (to subsist on) alms is better than fasting; compassion is preferable to liberality.'[5]

6. (Let the ascetic) shave (his head); let him have no property and no home.[6]

7. Let him beg food at seven houses which he has not selected (beforehand),[7]

8. (At the time) when the smoke (of the kitchen-fire) has ceased and the pestle lies motionless.[8]

9. Let him wear a single garment,[9]

10. Or cover his body with a skin or with grass that has been nibbled at by a cow.

11. Let him sleep on the bare ground.

12. Let him frequently change his residence,[10]

13. (Dwelling) at the extremity of the village, in a temple, or in an empty house, or at the root of a tree.

14. Let him (constantly) seek in his heart the knowledge (of the universal soul).[11]

15. (An ascetic) who lives constantly in the forest,

16. Shall not wander about within sight of the village-cattle.

17. 'Freedom from future births is certain for him who constantly dwells in the forest, who has subdued his organs of sensation and action, who has renounced all sensual gratification, whose mind is fixed in meditation on the Supreme Spirit, and who is (wholly) indifferent (to pleasure and pain).'

18. (Let him) not (wear) any visible mark (of his order), nor (follow) any visible rule of conduct.

19. Let him, though not mad, appear like one out of his mind.

20. Now they quote also (the following verses): 'There is no salvation for him who is addicted to[12] the pursuit of the science of words, nor for him who rejoices in captivating men, nor for him who is fond of (good) eating and (fine) clothing, nor for him who loves a pleasant dwelling.'

21. 'Neither by (explaining) prodigies and omens, nor by skill in astrology and palmistry, nor by casuistry and expositions (of the Śāstras), let him ever seek to obtain alms.'[13]

22. 'Let him not be dejected when he obtains nothing, nor glad when he receives something. Let him only seek as much as will sustain life, without caring for household property.'[14]

23. 'But he, forsooth, knows (the' road to) salvation who cares neither for a hut, nor for water, nor for clothes, nor for the three Pushkaras' (holy tanks), nor for a house, nor for a seat, nor for food.'[15]

24. In the morning and in the evening he may eat as much (food) as he obtains in the house of one Brāhmaṇa, excepting honey and meat,[16]

25. And he shall not (eat so much that he is quite) satiated.[17]

26. At his option (an ascetic) may (also) dwell in a village.

27. Let him not be crooked (in his ways); (let him) not (observe the rules of) impurity on account[18] of deaths (or births); let him not have a house; let him be of concentrated mind.

28. Let him not enjoy any object of sensual gratification.

29. Let him be (utterly) indifferent, avoiding to do injury or to show kindness to any living being.

30. To avoid backbiting, jealousy, pride, self-consciousness, unbelief, dishonesty, self-praise, blaming others, deceit, covetousness, delusion, anger, and envy is considered to be the duty of (men of) all orders.[19]

31. A Brāhmaṇa who wears the sacred thread, who holds in his hand a gourd filled with water, who is pure and avoids the food of Śūdras will not fail (to gain) the world of Brahman.[20]

Footnotes and references:

[1]:

X. Manu VI, 39; Yājñavalkya III, 61.

[2]:

Manu VI, 40.

[3]:

'The born and the unborn,' i.e. his ancestors who lose heaven, and his descendants who lose their caste.

[4]:

Manu VI, 39.

[5]:

Manu II, 83.

[6]:

Gautama III, 11, 22. The term parigraha, 'home,' includes the wife, the family, attendants, and a house.

[7]:

Viṣṇu XCVI, 3.

[8]:

Viṣṇu XCVI, 6; Manu VI, 56.

[9]:

Viṣṇu XCVI, 13. It is very probable that the single garment mentioned in the Sūtra is, as Kṛṣṇapaṇḍita thinks, a small strip of cloth to cover the ascetic's nakedness.

[10]:

-13. Viṣṇu XCVI, 10-12.

[11]:

Manu VI, 43, 65.

[12]:

I read 'ramyāvasathapriyasya,' with the majority of the MSS.

[13]:

Identical with Manu VI, 50.

[14]:

Viṣṇu XCVI, 4. Identical with Manu VI, 57.

[15]:

There are three Tīrthas called Pushkara; see Professor Jolly's note on Viṣṇu LXXXV, I.

[16]:

Kṛṣṇapaṇḍita thinks that this rule is a concession to those ascetics who are unable to subsist on one meal a day, as Manu VI, 55 prescribes.

[17]:

Manu VI, 59. 26. Manu VI, 94-95.

[18]:

The text is here probably corrupt. But I follow Kṛṣṇapaṇḍita. Several MSS. read aśaṭho, 'he shall not be a rogue,' for aśavo, 'he shall not observe the rules of impurity.'

[19]:

Viṣṇu II, 16-17.

[20]:

Kṛṣṇapaṇḍita believes that this Sūtra again refers to ascetics. But that is hardly possible, as ascetics are not allowed to wear a sacrificial thread (see above. Sūtra 18). I think that it is meant to emphatically assert that a Brāhmaṇa who is free from the shortcomings enumerated in the preceding Sūtra, and who follows the rule of conduct, will obtain salvation, whether he passes through the order of Saṃnyāsins or not.

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: