Manusmriti with the Commentary of Medhatithi

by Ganganatha Jha | 1920 | 1,381,940 words | ISBN-10: 8120811550 | ISBN-13: 9788120811553

This is the English translation of the Manusmriti, which is a collection of Sanskrit verses dealing with ‘Dharma’, a collective name for human purpose, their duties and the law. Various topics will be dealt with, but this volume of the series includes 12 discourses (adhyaya). The commentary on this text by Medhatithi elaborately explains various t...

Verse 1.80 [Manvantara]

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

मन्वन्तराण्यसङ्ख्यानि सर्गः संहार एव च ।
क्रीडन्निवैतत् कुरुते परमेष्ठी पुनः पुनः ॥ ८० ॥

manvantarāṇyasaṅkhyāni sargaḥ saṃhāra eva ca |
krīḍannivaitat kurute parameṣṭhī punaḥ punaḥ || 80 ||

Innumerable Manvantaras, as also Creation and Dissolution—all this the supreme lord calls into being again and again, as if in amusement—(80).

 

Medhātithi’s commentary (manubhāṣya):

Innumerable’—Whose number is not limited.

Objection—“In works on Astronomy and other subjects we find the number of Manvantaras stated as fourteen.”

Our answer is that they are ‘innumerable’ in the sense that they revert repeatedly; in the same manner as the ‘twelve months.’

Of ‘Creation’ and ‘Dissolution’ also the repitition never ceases.

He calls into being all this as if in amusement’:—An objection is raised—“A man takes to an amusement only when he seeks for pleasure; as for the Supreme Lord, since he has all his desires fulfilled, and since his very form consists of pure Bliss, his acts of creation and dissolution could not be due to amusement.”

It is in view of this fact that the author has added the qualifying term ‘as if.’ The real answer to the objection however is what has been stated above [in the Bhāṣya on verse 21, where it has been pointed out that creation and dissolution are primarily due to the previous acts of living beings.] The answer provided by the ‘Knowers of Brahman’ (Vedāntins) is that in ordinary life also, in the case of kings and other such persons, it is found that they often act for mere diversion, without desire for any particular thing—(80).

 

Explanatory notes by Ganganath Jha

Krīḍan’—cf. Brahmasūtra—‘Lokavattu līlākaivalyam.’ This idea of creation being a ‘sport’ for God is common in Hindu Theism.

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: