Significance of Vishvanatha kaviraja
Vishvanatha Kaviraja is a significant scholar in Sanskrit literature, recognized for his comprehensive work Sahityadarpana, which explores various aspects of poetic theory and aesthetics. He emphasized the importance of sentiment in poetry, elaborating on figures of speech and rhetorical devices to enhance poetic expression. His contributions extend to rasa theory, defining elements like Vyajokti, Atishayokti, and others, thus playing a crucial role in the understanding of Kavya, its structures, and the intricacies of literary embellishments in Indian poetics.
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'Vishvanatha kaviraja'
Vishvanatha Kaviraja is a prominent scholar in Hinduism who significantly contributed to Sanskrit literary theory, notably through his work "Sahitya-darpana," emphasizing rasa, poetic techniques, and the nuanced understanding of similes and sentiments in Kavya.
From: Sahitya-kaumudi by Baladeva Vidyabhushana
(1) A scholar who discussed the relationship between literal and implied meanings, emphasizing their equal importance.[1] (2) The commentator who explains the nature of irrelevance in understanding and highlights its common occurrence in textual analysis.[2] (3) A literary figure who gives examples to elucidate the proper usage of words and syntax in poetic forms.[3] (4) A notable commentator who explores and clarifies the concepts of implicit and explicit utpreksha, as well as their implications in poetry.[4] (5) A commentator who elaborates on the meaning of similes within literary works.[5]
From: Mudrarakshasa (literary study)
(1) An important figure in Sanskrit literature known for his work, Sahityadarpana, which discusses various literary concepts including Asangati.[6] (2) Visvanatha Kaviraja discusses the conventions of naming or giving titles to plays in the sixth chapter of his work Sahityadarpana.[7] (3) A significant figure in the discourse of rasa theory in Indian poetics, recognized for advocating and building upon Bharata's ideas.[8] (4) The author who provides a definition of Arthantaranyasa, contributing to its understanding in the context of Mudrarakshasa.[9] (5) A literary figure who provided a definition of Visheshokti in his work Sahityadarpana, focusing on literary techniques and aesthetic qualities in poetry.[10]
From: Hanuman Nataka (critical study)
(1) A commentator who discusses the scenario in which the hero and heroine love each other but are unable to unite, termed as Vipralambha Shringara.[11] (2) Vishvanatha Kaviraja is a prominent figure in Sanskrit literature known for his contributions to the theory and definition of Kavya, particularly drama.[12] (3) The author who states that the hero of a Nataka should come from a royal and famous family and could be of divine or mortal origin.[13] (4) An author who defined the Mahanataka in his work, Sahityadarpana.[14] (5) The author of the Sahityadarpana who was influenced by Shri Damodara Mishra and cited verses from the Hanumannataka.[15]
From: Malatimadhava (study)
(1) A scholar who opines on the nature of the Shringara rasa, particularly in the context of higher dignified erotic relationships.[16] (2) A figure who recognizes three primary types of guna in his literary analysis, reflecting a standard in poetic critiques.[17] (3) Vishvanatha Kaviraja views riti as a crucial factor in realizing sentiment, analogizing it to the relationship between body and soul.[18] (4) A literary figure who provides insights into the conventions of naming in Indian dramatic literature.[19] (5) A scholar who articulated the characteristics of a Prakarana, focusing on themes from worldly life.[20]
From: Harshacharita (socio-cultural Study)
(1) A critic who provided an authentic definition of kavya, identifying rasa as the spirit of poetry; also offered a modern classification for kavya.[21]
From: Matsya Purana (critical study)
(1) Vishvanatha Kaviraja is a prominent rhetorician who discusses and elaborates on the role of figures of speech in enhancing poetic sentiment in his work Sahityadarpana.[22] (2) A scholar who emphasized the importance of sentiment as the principal element in poetry.[23]