Significance of Review process
The review process is a vital step in scientific research publication, encompassing various evaluations to ensure manuscript quality and reliability. It includes expert assessments that enhance manuscripts before acceptance or rejection, and it is crucial for determining drug approval by regulatory authorities. Additionally, the review process aims to limit bias through structured evaluations, and it is essential for effective editorial practices, as recognized by the editorial team of the South African Family Practice journal. Overall, this process is key to maintaining high standards in scientific literature.
Synonyms: Evaluation process, Assessment procedure, Feedback mechanism, Evaluation, Assessment, Examination, Analysis, Inspection.
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
The concept of Review process in scientific sources
The Review process is a structured evaluation method guiding article selection and expert assessment for manuscript publication, essential for improving submissions and ensuring rigorous scientific standards, as recognized by the South African Family Practice journal.
From: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
(1) This is the procedure by which submitted manuscripts are evaluated for publication, and decisions about acceptance or rejection are made after its completion.[1] (2) The review process, including article selection and data charting, was guided by the PRISMA-ScR diagram, ensuring a structured approach.[2]
From: South African Family Practice
(1) This is a process that the editorial team of the South African Family Practice journal recognizes as valuable and important, particularly in shaping the individual manuscript.[3] (2) The process of evaluating a manuscript by experts in the field, often leading to improvements in the manuscript, and it is crucial for scientific research publication.[4]
From: South African Journal of Physiotherapy
(1) Reporting of this will be done according to the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which includes searches of databases and registers only.[5] (2) The review process will also be discussed and finalised by the new Editorial Board, in order to make it more efficient and effective.[6]
From: Journal of Public Health in Africa
(1) This is the procedure followed to evaluate and summarize the available evidence, which aimed to limit bias.[7]
From: Journal of Medicinal Plants for Economic Development
(1) This essential procedure involves identifying and selecting experts with relevant knowledge to assess submitted manuscripts for publication in a timely manner.[8]
From: South African Journal of HIV Medicine
(1) The essential elements that ensure a productive and timely process, involving the identification and selection of reviewers with expertise and interest in the relevant topics.[9]