Significance of Movable and immovable beings
Movable and immovable beings in Jainism and Dharmashastra encompass all forms of life and existence. Movable beings refer to sentient entities that can move freely, while immovable beings pertain to stationary, non-sentient entities. Both philosophies stress the impact of sinful actions on these beings, highlighting the interconnectedness of all life forms and non-living entities in the world. This classification emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations regarding all aspects of existence.
Synonyms: Animate and inanimate beings, Sentient and non-sentient beings, Animate and inanimate objects
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'Movable and immovable beings'
In Hinduism, movable beings encompass all living creatures that can move, while immovable beings include non-living entities. Together, they represent the complete spectrum of existence, illustrating the interplay between dynamic and static forms of life.
From: Manusmriti with the Commentary of Medhatithi
(1) The totality of existence that includes all living creatures (movable) and non-living entities (immovable) in the world.[1] (2) Refers to all forms of life, including those that can move freely and those that are stationary.[2]
Jain concept of 'Movable and immovable beings'
In Jainism, movable and immovable beings encompass all life forms, both sentient and non-sentient. This classification highlights that all entities, regardless of their ability to move, can be affected by sinful actions.
From: Acaranga-sutra
(1) All forms of life, including those that can move and those that are stationary.[3]
From: Sutrakritanga (English translation)
(1) Refers to all forms of life and existence, including sentient and non-sentient entities that can be harmed by sinful actions.[4]