Significance of Mammata
Mammata is a significant figure in the discourse of Sanskrit poetics, as detailed in various classical texts. In Arthashastra, he discusses the nature of poetry, while Natyashastra presents him as a rhetorician advocating for essential gunas. His contributions extend to Kavyashastra, where he addresses ornamentation in poetry, critiques categorization methods, and emphasizes nuanced word usage. Recognized as an influential poet and critic, Mammata's work, particularly in Kavya-prakasha, has greatly shaped the understanding of poetic structure, aesthetics, and literary rules.
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'Mammata'
Mammata in Hinduism is a pivotal figure in poetic and aesthetic discourse, recognized for his critique of poetry, promotion of key rhetorical concepts, and contributions to literary theory, notably through his work "Kavya-prakasha."
From: Sahitya-kaumudi by Baladeva Vidyabhushana
(1) A literary figure referenced in discussions about utpreksha, though he does not engage with the topic of implicit utpreksha.[1] (2) A theorist who describes the technical aspects of similes and suggests that their similarity can occur in various ways.[2] (3) A literary figure who refers to similes within the context of poetic ornamentation.[3] (4) a figure who comments on literary analysis[4] (5) Another commentator who addresses specific definitions related to bhava and rasa within the context of emotional expressions.[5]
From: Kavyamimamsa of Rajasekhara (Study)
(1) A figure criticized by Jayadeva, known for his definitions and concepts regarding poetry's structure.[6] (2) Another scholar involved in the discourse on plagiarism, mentioned as part of the Ancient Acarya group.[7] (3) A significant figure who supports the importance of literary power in poetic composition.[8] (4) A theorist in Sanskrit poetics who compared Riti and Vritti, examining their similarities and contributions to poetic composition.[9]
From: Mudrarakshasa (literary study)
(1) Another rhetorician supporting the view similar to Vishvanatha regarding the need for many significant epithets for Parikara.[10] (2) A rhetorician who supported the idea of only three essential gunas and stated that others are either merged into these or simply doshas.[11]
From: Shishupala-vadha (Study)
(1) A poetician asserting that poetry comprises word and sense, focusing on merits and the avoidance of faults.[12]