Significance of Intergroup comparison
Intergroup comparison refers to a statistical analysis method used to evaluate and compare outcomes between different groups in clinical studies. This approach is essential for assessing the effectiveness of various treatments by analyzing differences in results among treatment groups. It involves methods like ANOVA and other statistical techniques to determine if significant differences exist in treatment responses, efficacy, and clinical outcomes. Overall, intergroup comparisons play a critical role in understanding how different interventions perform relative to one another in research settings.
Synonyms: Intergroup analysis, Group comparison, Between-group comparison, Comparative study, Group analysis, Comparative analysis
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
The concept of Intergroup comparison in scientific sources
Intergroup comparison involves statistical analysis to evaluate differences between groups, such as comparing high caries to no caries in response to tea decoction and analyzing memory improvement across various treatment groups.
From: Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
(1) A method used in research to compare different treatment groups to assess the significance of differences in outcomes such as salivary calprotectin levels.[1] (2) A statistical analysis comparing outcomes between the test group and control group in the study.[2] (3) A statistical analysis comparing different groups in a study to assess variations in outcomes.[3] (4) A statistical analysis method used to compare the outcomes between different treatment groups in the study.[4] (5) The statistical analysis method used to compare results between different groups in the study.[5]
From: World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
(1) A method of comparing characteristics or outcomes between different groups in a study.[6] (2) The assessment made between different groups of patients to identify significant differences in scores related to symptoms.[7] (3) A comparative analysis conducted between different patient groups to assess variations in outcomes during the study.[8] (4) Analysis performed between Group A and Group B to assess differences in therapy outcomes.[9] (5) The evaluation of differences between the outcomes of two treatment groups in the study.[10]
From: International Ayurvedic Medical Journal
(1) A statistical approach used to compare outcomes between different groups in a clinical study, assessing the effectiveness of interventions.[11] (2) Comparison made between different groups within a study to assess relative effectiveness of treatment methods.[12] (3) A method of examining differences in outcomes between various treatment groups in a clinical study.[13] (4) Evaluating the effects of different treatment groups on symptom relief to assess the efficacy of treatments.[14] (5) A statistical analysis comparing the effects of the trial drug on patients against those who received a placebo.[15]
From: AYU (Journal of Research in Ayurveda)
(1) A method of analyzing differences between two or more distinct groups in a study.[16] (2) A statistical analysis performed to compare results between different groups, in this case, high caries versus no caries in response to tea decoction.[17] (3) The statistical analysis method used in the study to compare the memory improvement across different treatment groups.[18] (4) Comparative analyses between different groups of mice to evaluate the effects of various treatments, conducted by ANOVA.[19]
From: Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine
(1) A methodological approach in the study that compared the efficacy of Vidarikandadi Yog against placebo to identify significant differences in outcomes.[20]
From: Ayushdhara journal
(1) Statistical analysis performed to compare outcomes between the study group and the control group.[21]