Significance of Impersonal liberation
Impersonal liberation in Vaishnavism is described as a form of liberation that lacks personal connection, contrasting with the intimate devotion of bhakti. It is often compared to sayujya-mukti, regarded as less desirable than a personal relationship with Krishna. This blissful state is sought after by many but is only partially comprehended by demigods. Ultimately, it represents spiritual enlightenment without individual identity, which is viewed with indifference by the brahmana.
Synonyms: -,
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'Impersonal liberation'
Impersonal liberation in Hinduism is seen as a detached blissful state, lacking personal connection and individual identity. It is often viewed as less desirable than the affectionate relationship with Krishna and is only partially grasped by demigods.
From: Brihad Bhagavatamrita (commentary)
(1) Moksha, a state of liberation characterized by the absence of individual consciousness, often viewed as less fulfilling than personal devotion.[1] (2) a state of spiritual enlightenment devoid of individual identity, which the brahmana viewed with apathy[2] (3) A state often equated with sayujya-mukti, depicted as less desirable than the personal relationship with Krishna.[3] (4) A blissful state that lacks specific qualities, sought by many but only partially understood by demigods.[4] (5) A form of liberation that lacks personal connection, contrasted with the affectionate nature of bhakti.[5]
From: Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu
(1) A state of existence where one merges with the supreme reality and loses individuality, which the speaker does not pray for.[6] (2) A form of liberation that emphasizes a disconnection from personal identity, focusing instead on the self as a universal presence.[7] (3) A form of liberation that lacks personal engagement or relational aspect, mentioned in the context of Shishupala receiving mercy despite his offenses.[8]
From: Bhajana-Rahasya
(1) The desire for a detached, non-personal union with the divine, which the speaker wishes to avoid.[9] (2) The state of self-realization free from personal identity, which is seen as a misguided pursuit compared to fulfilling devotional service.[10]