Significance of First wrong-doer
The concept of the First wrong-doer in Theravada Buddhism refers to the individual who initially commits an offence, setting a precedent for how future actions are judged. This designation impacts accountability and the classification of subsequent wrongdoings within the community. The First wrong-doer may receive leniency in terms of penalties, particularly in cases involving monks and nuns. The role of this individual is crucial in shaping the understanding of mistakes and the associated rules within the monastic order.
Synonyms: Culprit, Offender, Wrongdoer, Perpetrator, Miscreant
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Buddhist concept of 'First wrong-doer'
In Buddhism, the term "First wrong-doer" denotes the initial individual, often a nun, who commits an offense, potentially mitigating their accountability and influencing the context of subsequent actions within the community's conduct guidelines.
From: Vinaya Pitaka (1): Bhikkhu-vibhanga (the analysis of Monks’ rules)
(1) A term used in the rules which offers consideration for those who may unintentionally violate the meal regulations.[1] (2) Refers to the initial individual who commits an offence, indicating a point of reference for assessing wrongdoing within the community.[2] (3) The initial person who commits a violation of conduct, potentially influencing the perception of subsequent actions.[3] (4) An individual who has originally committed the fault being discussed in the context of accountability.[4] (5) An indication in the text that denotes a particular circumstance under which a monk might be excused from an offence related to physical aggression.[5]
From: Vinaya Pitaka (2): Bhikkhuni-vibhanga (the analysis of Nun’ rules)
(1) Refers to the individual in a situation who initiates wrongdoing or misconduct that necessitates recognition or intervention.[6] (2) The individual identified as the initial perpetrator of the offence within the communal context.[7] (3) Indicates a scenario where the first individual to violate the rules is considered in determining the legitimacy of ordination.[8] (4) A reference to an initial individual who commits a wrongdoing, impacting how subsequent actions are judged.[9] (5) A term referring to the initial party who commits an offense in the exchange of robes, impacting the application of rules.[10]