Significance of Figurative meanings
Figurative meaning, as defined in Dharmashastra, encompasses the use of terms like 'king' to represent the Kshatriya caste, extending beyond the concept of a formal ruler to imply a wider leadership role. Additionally, it includes interpretations of legal terminology that may not align with their literal meanings, particularly concerning punishment. This broader understanding emphasizes the contextual significance of language within Dharmashastra's legal and social frameworks.
Synonyms: Metaphorical meaning, Symbolic meaning, Allegorical meaning
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'Figurative meanings'
In Hinduism, figurative meaning extends beyond literal interpretations, exemplified by using 'king' for the Kshatriya caste, emphasizing broader leadership, and reinterpreting legal terminology regarding punishment, highlighting contextual significance.
From: Manusmriti with the Commentary of Medhatithi
(1) The use of the term 'king' to refer to the Kshatriya caste, highlighting that its significance is not limited to an anointed ruler but also includes a broader leadership context.[1] (2) An interpretation applied to terms used in legal texts, which may differ from their literal meanings in the context of punishment.[2]
From: Vakyapadiya of Bhartrihari
(1) The interpretation where the term shastri does not denote a literal 'dagger' but implies something that is similar to it.[3] (2) Interpretations of words that convey meanings beyond their literal definitions; these differ from the idea of upacarasatta which is more about presence in thought.[4]
From: Sahitya-kaumudi by Baladeva Vidyabhushana
(1) The meaning that arises from the context or indirect expression rather than a direct interpretation.[5] (2) Figurative meaning pertains to non-literal interpretations in poetry, allowing for deeper understanding.[6]
From: Mandukya Upanishad
(1) An interpretation that is not to be taken literally, used here to describe the duality of Jiva and Atman as it appears in various scriptures before creation.[7]
From: Garga Samhita (English)
(1) Refers to a deeper interpretation beyond literal understanding, often found in metaphoric expressions in the text.[8]