Significance of False argument
In Vaishnavism, false argument encompasses misleading statements made by envious brahmanas, aimed at undermining Haridasa's devotional practices. These arguments represent misconceptions that can discourage individuals from engaging in devotional service by hardening their hearts. Essentially, false arguments are claims lacking truth, often used to challenge the legitimacy of worship and devotion within the faith, highlighting the dangers of such misleading reasoning in spiritual discourse.
Synonyms: Fallacy, Misconception, Invalid reasoning
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'False argument'
In Hinduism, "False argument" signifies misleading reasoning that fosters misconceptions, obstructs devotional service, and undermines practices, particularly as illustrated by envious brahmanas challenging Haridasa’s authenticity through deceptive claims.
From: Chaitanya Bhagavata
(1) Arguments against loud chanting, which are viewed as misguided and influenced by Kali, the demonic force in Hindu belief.[1] (2) False arguments are misconceptions that can harden the heart and prevent the propensity for devotional service from appearing.[2] (3) Misleading statements presented by the envious brahmana in an attempt to undermine the validity of Haridasa's devotional practices.[3] (4) Arguments used by those who try to uphold their interpretations of Vedanta in contradiction to genuine teachings.[4] (5) Misleading reasoning that distracts individuals from the true path of devotion and spiritual understanding.[5]
From: Brihad Bhagavatamrita (commentary)
(1) A reasoning or claim that is misleading or devoid of truth, often used to question the validity of worship.[6]
From: Shiva Purana
(1) Misleading reasoning used to deceive others, particularly in the context of Shiva's nature.[7]
From: The Sarva-Darsana-Samgraha
(1) An instance in which the premises do not lead to a logically sound conclusion, as illustrated with the example of 'The mountain has smoke because it has fire,' which mispresents the relationship between major and middle terms.[8]
The concept of False argument in local and regional sources
False argument involves misleading reasoning employed by heretical teachers to justify their doctrines, ultimately distorting truth and promoting confusion among followers. This highlights the significance of critical analysis in theological discourse.
From: Buddhist records of the Western world (Xuanzang)
(1) Misleading reasoning used by the heretical teacher to support their doctrines.[9]