Significance of Dullness
Dullness is perceived differently in Vaishnavism and Theravada. In Vaishnavism, it denotes a state devoid of vibrancy and vitality, particularly associated with Mukunda's friends. In contrast, Theravada views Dullness as an immoral mental quality that embodies a lack of clarity and awareness, highlighting a deficiency in understanding and insight, especially in philosophical contexts. Both traditions underscore the detrimental aspects of Dullness, albeit from unique spiritual perspectives.
Synonyms: Monotony, Apathy, Flatness
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Buddhist concept of 'Dullness'
Dullness in Buddhism may be interpreted as an immoral mental state marked by unclear awareness and a deficiency in understanding, particularly regarding philosophical concepts, hindering spiritual growth and insight.
From: Introducing Buddhist Abhidhamma
(1) The lack of understanding or insight, primarily in matters of philosophy.[1]
From: Patthanuddesa Dipani
(1) An immoral mental property characterized by a lack of clarity and awareness.[2]
From: Cetasikas
(1) The state of ignorance and lack of understanding that characterizes moha, preventing clear judgment and true perception.[3]
Hindu concept of 'Dullness'
In Hinduism, Dullness signifies a state devoid of vibrancy and vitality, particularly illustrated through the experiences of Mukunda's friends, highlighting a lack of spiritual awareness and engagement.
From: Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu
(1) Referred to as jadata, this term describes a mental state of lethargy or lack of vitality, part of sambhrama-priti.[4] (2) A state lacking in vibrancy and vitality, described in relation to Mukunda's friends.[5]