Significance of Criterion validity
Criterion validity refers to the accuracy of a screening instrument by assessing its correlation with an external criterion or gold standard, often evaluated through sensitivity and specificity values. It indicates how well a test measures what it is intended to, related to work and disease status. Studies showed varying evaluations, with some using established tools like X-rays for comparison. The concept is also significant in psychiatry, where further research is needed to assess specific screening tools for psychosis.
Synonyms: Criterion-related validity, Predictive validity, Concurrent validity, External validity
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
The concept of Criterion validity in scientific sources
Criterion validity measures how effectively a tool correlates with established standards or outcomes. The provided text discusses its significance in validating instruments like the RNLI and the RAS-RCVD tool against recognized benchmarks for accuracy and usefulness.
From: South African Journal of Physiotherapy
(1) This is the validity of the scoring criteria, which is investigated by comparing kinematic measurements with observer ratings.[1] (2) Criterion validity is a measure used for the index and is somewhat related to work status and disease status, indicating how well the RNLI measures what it is intended to measure.[2] (3) Concurrent validity was evaluated in three of the reviewed studies while only one study reported on criterion validity of the measurement tool, and Harrison et al. (2005) and Lee et al. (2003) Tousignant et al. (2000) determined concurrent validity using X-rays as the gold standard.[3] (4) This is defined as the correlation of a scale with an accepted instrument or measure, which the authors employed a convergent approach.[4]
From: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
(1) This is the extent to which the results of a particular test or measurement tool correlate with an external criterion, which is also assessed.[5] (2) This is a type of validity that assesses how well a test or instrument correlates with other measures of the same construct or with a gold standard, indicating its accuracy.[6]
From: Journal of Public Health in Africa
(1) This is one of the types of validity, and it refers to the accuracy of the screening instrument, which is seen from its sensitivity and specificity values.[7]
From: South African Journal of Psychiatry
(1) This refers to future studies that are warranted to examine the usefulness of the psychosis screening questionnaire, according to the provided text.[8] (2) The extent to which the tool's results correlate with an external measure.[9]