Significance of Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria, in the context of Ayurveda and Health Sciences, encompasses the methods and standards used to evaluate the impact of treatments. These criteria involve a range of parameters, including both subjective reports from patients, like pain levels and symptom experiences, and objective observations such as wound healing, lab tests, and physical assessments. They serve to measure the effectiveness of interventions, monitor patient progress, and determine improvements in various conditions, using standardized scales and specific measures tailored to the study's focus.
Synonyms: Evaluation standards, Grading parameters, Assessment standards, Evaluation criteria, Performance indicators
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'Assessment criteria'
In Hinduism, assessment criteria are methods to evaluate treatment outcomes, encompassing subjective experiences (pain, stiffness) and objective observations (size, skin color). They employ diverse parameters, including grading symptoms, specific factors (Dosha, Agni), and standardized scales (PASI, REEDA), to determine treatment effectiveness.
From: Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences
(1) Assessment criteria included subjective and objective parameters, which were assessed using the Constant Murley Score to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment.[1] (2) Assessment criteria of Vishada Guna was to validate the assessment criteria of Vishada Guna, and the study was conducted over 25 healthy volunteers (16-70 years) who had the Dhatu Samya Lakshanas and 25 patients having the Meda Kshaya Lakshanas (16-70 years).[2] (3) These are the methods and parameters used to evaluate the patients' conditions and responses to treatment, including subjective and objective measures.[3] (4) It refers to the specific measures or indicators used to evaluate the condition of the subjects in the study, including both subjective and objective criteria for Sthaulya and hypothyroidism.[4] (5) It will be done based on subjective parameters.[5]
From: International Research Journal of Ayurveda and Yoga
(1) Included the Ashtavibhrama, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), and General Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) in this study.[6] (2) The table included observations of Symptoms like Stambhan (Stiffness), Sandhi shola (Pain In multiple joints), and Sandhi shotha (Swelling).[7] (3) It includes subjective parameters, their English synonyms, and gradation index.[8] (4) These are the standards or methods used to evaluate mental health in the study.[9] (5) The standards used to evaluate the patient's condition, including observations and follow-up to monitor progress.[10]
From: Journal of Ayurvedic and Herbal Medicine
(1) The assessment criteria include various aspects like itching, pain, bleeding, skin appearance, and the appearance of new lesions.[11] (2) These are the factors used to evaluate the patient's condition, including DAS score and grading of pain and swelling, as described within the document.[12] (3) The 'Assessment Criteria' are detailed in a table, including gradations for pain in the lower abdomen, duration of pain, nature of pain, and the presence or absence of Rajah krucchra vimunchana.[13] (4) This describes the methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments, including subjective and objective parameters.[14] (5) This refers to the standards that were used to assess the patient's condition, based on their subjective experiences and reported symptoms.[15]
The concept of Assessment criteria in scientific sources
Assessment criteria are standards and measures used to evaluate treatment effectiveness and patient outcomes. These include parameters for assessing symptom improvement (pain, sleep, etc.), disease characteristics, and the reliability of assessment tools in clinical studies. They can involve both subjective and objective measures.
From: South African Journal of Physiotherapy
(1) The ethics of assessment demand that the constructs and this are made available to learners and that a range of tasks and assessments be included in an assessment programme.[16] (2) The specific guidelines used to evaluate students' performance in a clinical setting, and each key performance area and associated criteria was based on an agreement of at least 75% of the responses by the panel.[17] (3) These are the specific standards or benchmarks used to evaluate student performance within each key performance area, and their clear definition is essential for minimizing evaluator bias.[18] (4) These are used to evaluate students' clinical performance in conjunction with key performance areas, as explored in a 2011 Delphi study by Joseph and colleagues.[19]
From: International Journal of Pharmacology
(1) The method of dividing therapeutic efficacy into three categories: Significantly effective, effective and ineffective.[20] (2) Standards used to evaluate the therapeutic effects and improvement in clinical symptoms.[21]
From: South African Family Practice
(1) The study compared the final marks of Master’s dissertations, without focusing on specific assessment criteria. The current assessment tool was not reliable as different assessors allocated different marks in several assessment categories. The study addressed issues around reliability of the assessment tool.[22] (2) These are the standards used to evaluate portfolios, essential for addressing subjectivity and ensuring fair assessment outcomes.[23]
From: Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics
(1) These are various criteria during process development, release specifications, and stability studies suggested by the Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research of the US Food and Drug Administration.[24]
From: Sustainability Journal (MDPI)
(1) It is a criteria that involves aligning the assessment according to competencies, learning outcomes, activities, indicators, and feedback in a workflow model.[25] (2) These are the specific factors or measures used to evaluate the performance or quality of different options or solutions, providing a framework for comparing and ranking them.[26] (3) Assessment criteria is the relative importance of assigning weights to construct the vulnerability index, and it is an issue to be addressed in future research to improve the Urban Vulnerability Assessment framework.[27] (4) These are specific standards or requirements used to evaluate the quality and suitability of studies for decision support.[28] (5) The next step in the methodology is the determination of these that will be used for the calculation of the suitability values inside the selected areas.[29]
From: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (MDPI)
(1) These are the benchmarks or standards used to evaluate the performance, quality, or impact of a project, policy, or program, providing a framework for measuring progress and making informed decisions.[30] (2) Standards or guidelines used to evaluate the significance of pollution levels.[31] (3) Many members who have been victims of "assessment criteria" have felt offended by the questions asked, highlighting the negative experiences of some individuals.[32] (4) Assessment criteria need to be unified and compared to ensure the quality of assessments and protect the subjective right to dependency care.[33] (5) Established standards or benchmarks used to evaluate and determine the quality, effectiveness, or suitability of a particular environment for older adults.[34]