Significance of Animate and inanimate object
The keyphrase "Animate and inanimate object" pertains to two distinct philosophical perspectives in Buddhism and Vaishnavism. In Buddhism, it emphasizes categories of existence that reflect the transient nature of life and matter, highlighting concepts of suffering (dukkha) and non-ego (anatta). In Vaishnavism, it refers to living beings and non-living things, particularly in the context of the cowherdesses inquiring about Krishna's presence. Both interpretations underscore the significance of these categories within their respective teachings.
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Buddhist concept of 'Animate and inanimate object'
In Buddhism, animate and inanimate objects symbolize the transient nature of existence, emphasizing the concepts of suffering (dukkha) and non-ego (anatta). This distinction encourages an understanding of impermanence in all forms of life and matter.
From: Apadana commentary (Atthakatha)
(1) Refers to all entities observed by the king, highlighting the distinction between living (animate) beings and non-living (inanimate) things, both afflicted by impermanence.[1]
Hindu concept of 'Animate and inanimate object'
In Hinduism, animate and inanimate objects encompass both living beings and non-living entities, highlighting the interconnectedness of all creations, as seen in the cowherdesses' inquiries about Krishna's location.
From: Prem Sagar (English translation)
(1) Refers to the animals, birds, trees, and other entities that the cowherdesses question in hopes of finding Krishna.[2]
From: Brihat Samhita
(1) Refers to living beings and non-living things that are allocated to various asterisms (nakshatra).[3]