Vinaya Pitaka (1): The Analysis of Monks’ Rules (Bhikkhu-vibhanga)

by I. B. Horner | 2014 | 345,334 words | ISBN-13: 9781921842160

The English translation of the Bhikkhu-vibhanga: the first part of the Suttavibhanga, which itself is the first book of the Pali Vinaya Pitaka, one of the three major ‘baskets’ of Therevada canonical literature. It is a collection of rules for Buddhist monks. The English translation of the Vinaya-pitaka (first part, bhikkhu-vibhanga) contains many...

Monks’ Expiation (Pācittiya) 25

Bu-Pc.25.1.1 BD.2.282 … at Sāvatthī in the Jeta Grove in Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery. Now at that time a monk was walking for alms in Sāvatthī along a certain road. And a nun was walking for alms along that road. Then that monk spoke thus to that nun: “Go, sister, in such and such a place alms-food is being given.” And she spoke thus: “Go, master, in such and such a place alms-food is being given.”

These had become friends through constantly seeing (one another). Now at that time robe-material was being distributed to the Order. Then that nun, going for exhortation, approached that monk, and having approached and greeted that monk, she stood at a respectful distance. As she was standing at a respectful distance, that monk spoke thus to that nun:

“Sister, this is my share of the robe-material, you may accept it.”

“Yes, master, my robe is worn thin.” Then that monk gave that nun the robe-material. Then that monk became one whose robe was worn thin. Monks spoke thus to this monk.

“Your reverence, make up your robe-material now.” Then that monk told this matter to the monks. Those who were modest monks … spread it about, saying:

“How can a monk give robe-material to a nun?” …

“Is it true, as is said, that you, monk, gave robe-material to a nun?”

“It is true, lord.”

“Is she a relation of yours, monk, or not a relation?”

“She is not a relation, lord,” he said.

“Foolish man, one who is not a relation does not know what is suitable or what is unsuitable, or what BD.2.283 is right or what is wrong for a nun who is not a relation.[1] How can you, foolish man, give robe-material to a nun who is not a relation? It is not, foolish man, for pleasing those who are not (yet) pleased … And thus, monks, this rule of training should be set forth:

“Whatever monk should give robe-material to a nun who is not a relation, there is an offence of expiation.”

And thus this rule of training for monks came to be laid down by the lord.


Bu-Pc.25.2.1 Then scrupulous monks did not give robe-material in exchange to nuns.[2] The nuns … spread it about, saying:

“How can the masters not give robe-material to us in exchange?” Vin.4.60

Monks heard these nuns who … spread it about. Then these monks told this matter to the lord. Then the lord on this occasion, in this connection, having given reasoned talk addressed the monks, saying:

“Monks, I allow you to give in exchange to five (classes of people): to a monk, a nun, a female probationer, a male novice, a female novice. I allow you, monks, to give in exchange to these five (classes of people). And thus, monks, this rule of training should be set forth:

Whatever monk should give robe-material to a nun who is not a relation, except in exchange, there is an offence of expiation.”[3]


Bu-Pc.25.3.1 Whatever means: … is monk to be understood in this case.

Not a relation means: one who is not related on the mother’s side or the father’s side back through seven generations.[4]

BD.2.284 Nun means: one ordained by both Orders.

Robe-material means: any one robe-material of the six (kinds of) robe-materials, (including) the least one fit for assignment.[5]

Except in exchange means: setting aside (the fact that) he gives in exchange, there is an offence of expiation.


Bu-Pc.25.3.2 If he thinks that she is not a relation when she is not a relation, (and) gives robe-material (to her), except in exchange, there is an offence of expiation. If he is in doubt as to whether she is a relation … If he thinks that she is a relation when she is not a relation … there is an offence of expiation. If he gives robe-material to one ordained by one (Order only), except in exchange, there is an offence of wrong-doing. If he thinks that she is not a relation when she is a relation, there is an offence of wrong-doing. If he is in doubt as to whether she is a relation, there is an offence of wrong-doing. If he thinks that she is a relation when she is a relation, there is no offence.


Bu-Pc.25.3.3 There is no offence if she is a relation; if there is an exchange; if there is a large thing for a small thing, or a small thing for a large thing; if a nun takes it on trust; if she takes it for the time being; if he gives another requisite, except robe-material; if she is a female probationer, a female novice; if he is mad, if he is the first wrong-doer.[6]

The Fifth

Footnotes and references:

1.

Cf. above, BD.2.39, BD.2.44.

2.

Cf. above, BD.2.39, where scrupulous monks did not accept robes in exchange.

3.

Cf. Bu-NP.5, where it is an offence for a monk to receive a robe from a nun who is not related, except in exchange.

4.

See above, BD.2.31.

5.

See above, BD.2.7.

6.

Cf. above, BD.2.41, and below, BD.2.287.

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: