The Tattvasangraha [with commentary]

by Ganganatha Jha | 1937 | 699,812 words | ISBN-10: 8120800583 | ISBN-13: 9788120800588

This page contains verse 2916 of the 8th-century Tattvasangraha (English translation) by Shantarakshita, including the commentary (Panjika) by Kamalashila: dealing with Indian philosophy from a Buddhist and non-Buddhist perspective. The Tattvasangraha (Tattvasamgraha) consists of 3646 Sanskrit verses; this is verse 2916.

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

अतो यत्रापि मिथ्यात्वं परेभ्यः प्रतिपाद्यते ।
तत्राप्येतद्द्वयं वाच्यं नतु साधर्म्यमात्रकम् ॥ २९१६ ॥

ato yatrāpi mithyātvaṃ parebhyaḥ pratipādyate |
tatrāpyetaddvayaṃ vācyaṃ natu sādharmyamātrakam || 2916 ||

“For these reasons, even in cases where the falsity is explained to others,—these two ideas have to be pointed out,—and not mere similarity.”—(2916)

 

Kamalaśīla’s commentary (tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā):

The Buddhists and others have argued that the Words of the Veda must be false,—because they are words,—like such human assertions as ‘Fire is cool’.

The Mīmāṃsaka proceeds to show that this argument is ‘Inconclusive’.—[see verse 2916 above]

In cases’—such as that of the Vedic Injunction.

These two ideas’—i.e. the idea that the truth is otherwise than what has been said in the Veda, and also that what has been so said has had a defective source.

Mere similarity’—i.e. the mere fact of being ‘words’ and thereby being similar to human assertions.—(2916)

Question:—Why should mere similarity not be urged?

Answer:—[see verses 2917-2919 next]

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: