The Tattvasangraha [with commentary]

by Ganganatha Jha | 1937 | 699,812 words | ISBN-10: 8120800583 | ISBN-13: 9788120800588

This page contains verse 408 of the 8th-century Tattvasangraha (English translation) by Shantarakshita, including the commentary (Panjika) by Kamalashila: dealing with Indian philosophy from a Buddhist and non-Buddhist perspective. The Tattvasangraha (Tattvasamgraha) consists of 3646 Sanskrit verses; this is verse 408.

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

पुद्गलादिपरीक्षासु द्वैराश्यप्रतिषेधनात् ।
द्विरूपोऽतिशयो नास्ति न वाऽप्यनुभयात्मकः ॥ ४०८ ॥

pudgalādiparīkṣāsu dvairāśyapratiṣedhanāt |
dvirūpo'tiśayo nāsti na vā'pyanubhayātmakaḥ || 408 ||

In course of the examination of the ‘pudgala’, etc. it has been explained that both alternatives cannot be accepted. hence the ‘condition’ cannot be both ‘different’ and ‘non-different’; nor can it be neither ‘different’ nor ‘non-different—(408)

 

Kamalaśīla’s commentary (tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā):

The other party now puts forward the view that the ‘Auxiliaries’ of the Permanent Thing become so by reason of their serving the same purpose as the latter [the second alternative suggested under Text 397]. To this effect, some people argue as follows: “The Permanent Thing does not require the Auxiliaries,—and yet apart from the Auxiliaries, it cannot bring about its effect; the fact of the matter is that its very nature is such that it produces its effect only when all its auxiliaries are close to it,—and never by itself, like the Final Cause, Hence even though the thing be always present, there is no possibility of all its effects being produced simultaneously.”

This is the view set forth in the following—[see verses 409-410 next]

Like what you read? Consider supporting this website: